Comment Fossil is awesome (was: I am not going to convert) (Score 1) 245
I agree 100%
www.fossil-scm.org
Comment Re:The Fed (Score 1) 458
If there's Lithium in the water, it's likely that the populace won't -revolt- either.
That's why Lithium is an important ingredient of Soylent Green.
Comment Re:Here's praying... (Score 1) 207
Where's all my cool Linux stuff on Solaris, though?
Linux by itself is "just" a kernel. Solaris has a decent kernel of its own, doesn't need Linux. Lots of GNU in userland though, about as much as in GNU/Linux.
Comment Re:His Holy etc. (Score 1) 470
I just call her HRH E2R.
That should be HRM, you insensitive clod! She'll ban you to the Falkland Islands.
Comment Re:Free the blue smoke! (Score 1) 357
stun guns, Van der Graaf Generator..."
That's far too exotic. A few seconds in a microwave oven will do, including sparks and blue smoke.
Comment Re:WARNING! (Score 1) 135
The link in the parent comment caused my X session to unexpectedly terminate.
One X won't do, you need a triple-X session.
Comment Re:Let's see (Score 1) 342
$ man woman
No manual entry for woman.
(emphasis mine)
Comment Re:Terrible Summary (Score 1) 114
Comment Re:XSS (Score 1) 232
The lock.gif image will still exist on the server whether you're logged in or not.
It's not about whether or not the image (or any other element, it doesn't have to be an image) exists, but rather if the request for it will be honoured by the bank server.
This scheme works for any request that is answered only when the user is logged in.
Comment Second post (Score -1, Offtopic) 898
Or ?
(wow, this feel childish)
Comment Re:Nice start... (Score 1) 305
Parent posted said that 386 offered some new feature that enabled preemptive multitasking. Ie. that it was not possible in earlier CPUs.
I read that, and I wondered which feature that might have been.
It was possible on earlier CPUs: a long time ago I wrote a tiny preemptive multitasking kernel on a 8086 as an exercise.
Preemption of the running task and switching to (dispatching) another one was done in an interrupt service routine, triggered by a timer.
Comment Re:Nice start... (Score 1) 305
A kernel implementation? *ducks*
Exactly!
Comment Re:Nice start... (Score 2, Insightful) 305
Uh, the Intel 386 didn't offer anything that somehow made preemptive multitasking possible.
Huh? What more do you need for preemptive multitasking than a timer interrupt ?
Comment Re:Windows & Documentation (Score 1) 667
I prefer fossil http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/index.wiki