Comment Re:What I wanted was Windows 95b (Score 3, Informative) 21
Good news! Someone hacked it into existence.
It's done wonders for my addiction to Win 3.x games.
Good news! Someone hacked it into existence.
It's done wonders for my addiction to Win 3.x games.
Fraud. I'm talking about fraud.
When I say "destroyed the market for that model" I mean "the short-seller spread misinformation that severely and permanently reduced the value of the vehicles, such as falsifying evidence they were dangerous, from which the brand never recovered."—even if such deception were prosecuted (which, increasingly, under the current administration, it isn't) there is a massive temptation to attempt it, which is amplified by leveraging debt.
That is ideal. Economic growth is not an unqualified net positive for society, and lending is the root cause of most of its ills. With borrowing as it is practised by hegemons today, there are only two endings: either they must close the loop, using the dirty money to architect a revenue-extracting monster that milks non-borrowed money to pay off the debts, or the system collapses under its own weight, like Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme in the 2008 financial crisis. Debt creates its own incentives to abuse the commons and impoverish the public.
Of course, not being content with abusing the commons, there are also implications for abuse of single wealthy lenders, too. It would also effectively outlaw short-selling, since that consists of borrowing assets—the items being traded—then destroying the price, and pocketing the difference. If you think about it, this isn't even adding value to the economy; it's just skimming value off the inventory of whomever you're borrowing from.
If anyone tried this with a physical asset the lender would be apoplectic: "You borrowed 50 cars from me, sold them, destroyed the market for that model, and bought them back at a pittance. Now my inventory of 1,000 cars of the same model is worth a thousand pittances! Why would I ever do business with you ever again?!"—it only works as a system if the lender assumes that the assets will recover value over time, but the degenerate gambler doing the borrowing is incentivised to outright ruin the assets they're borrowing beyond any hope of recovery. In a sense they're even less ethical than corporate raiders, since both the company who issued the stock and the lender are being abused.
In theory slippery slopes are a fallacy, but it's really something else when there are people out there actively looking for slanted surfaces and applying experimental lubricants to every single one they can find.
Yes, Polymarket is the most degenerate, nihilistic, accelerationist bullshit imaginable. At best its creators are willfully in denial about this, since they have tried to ban assassination bets, but more likely they are just trying to maintain a facade of plausible deniability.
In a healthy society, the case of Polymarket would be studied as precedent in an ongoing debate about the possibility of criminalizing the very concept of financial speculation, especially placing a bid with borrowed assets.
Using AI is training AI to replace you. If you can be replaced with AI, you will be, and should be.
If you don't use AI, your peers will be, and you will be replaced by AI anyway.
Good Luck
"Scathing execration" comes to mind as a possible first step on the evolutionary chain from the latter to the former.
Lying to yourself is the biggest danger for trying to stay Anonymous. With enough patterns to recognize, the idea that one can hide is a delusional take.
The only way to win, is to run EVERYTHING you post through an AI that changes the tone and words used in all your online activity. But even then that may itself be a lie.
It's Not Enough to "Caution Against".
That language is TOO PASSIVE.
The correct and appropriate phrase is "HELL NO" and start tossing out 1st, 4th, 5th amendment claims IN COURT.
I read that and was simultaneously laughing and angry. I'd call it a load of horseshit, but that would be insulting to horseshit.
What a bunch of windbaggery. Meaningless, feckless corporate speak.
We know. They know we know. We know they know we know. They don't care.
Nothing says "fuck you" like a "well worded" press release. It was only missing the AI EM-DASH.
Climate is notoriously complex set of wild interactions that are unknown at best. Predictions of climate crisis have always been wildly off, because the goal is to scare people into action.
But the boy who cried wolf is a cautionary tale that climate people failed to learn.
Politicians: How do we stop climate change?
Experts: Reduce consumption, limit abuses by the powerful, instate a carbon tax with teeth
Politicians: Unacceptable! AI, how do we stop climate change?
Every single LLM since GPT-3.5: Reduce consumption, limit abuses by the powerful, instate a carbon tax with teeth
Politicians: Unacceptable! Techbros, how do we stop climate change?
Techbros: FEED ME!
It is a feature, not a bug!
But hey, lets claim incompetence and not malice even though they are indistinguishable at this point.
We're now charging PREMIUM for our new ProAudiophile(tm) MUD interface. Guaranteed or your money back!
You forgot the obligatory "Get Off My Lawn!"
And yes, BUTTONS and DIALS are best for drivers.
The alternative is voice and steering wheel controls, but I don't like either as much as dials and actual buttons.
"Progress!!!!"
Is a computer language with goto's totally Wirth-less?