Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Themes... (Score 1) 452

So what you seem to be saying (trying to read between the lines here) is that you used Linux once for a month or so and didn't like it. I assume this was back about a decade ago based on your very vague criticisms. In the mean time I can set my mom or dad up with it and they are good to go (not terribly computer literate and in their 70s). Even my wife can use Linux just fine and she's still proud that she can "google" and "facebook" and "ebay" so this mythical learning curve can't be that bad.

Comment Re:Wow, 16GB? (Score 1) 40

Bah, you kids and your fancy schmancy 1Gb HDD. My first HDD was 10Mb. Of course, it was an upgrade to the 720kb floppy drive on my Atari ST with the massive 512Kb RAM (later upgraded to 1024Kb by soldering more RAM chips). All of these were big upgrades to tape drives (literally audio cassette drives) - the seek times on those were..... disturbingly long. I still have an old 8088 machine in the corner of my lab with a 20Mb hdd (and an ISA monochrome video card).
Data Storage

Submission + - Disk drive failures 15 times what vendors say

jcatcw writes: "A Carnegie Mellon University study indicates that customers are replacing disk drives more frequently than vendor estimates of mean time to failure (MTTF) would require.. The study examined large production systems, including high-performance computing sites and Internet services sites running SCSI, FC and SATA drives. The data sheets for the drives indicated MTTF between 1 and 1.5 million hours. That should mean annual failure rates of 0.88%, annual replacement rates were between 2% and 4%. The study also shows no evidence that Fibre Channel drives are any more reliable than SATA drives."

Slashdot Top Deals

Hacking's just another word for nothing left to kludge.

Working...