The first thing I do on installing newer Ubuntu releases:

apt-get remove coreutils-from-uutils --allow-remove-essential

(and similarly revert to the original sudo version)

Is avoiding the trial and error step advisable? Certainly it won't always give you a material with the desired property but how many times do those 'errors' have their own unique benefits? For example the search for a synthetic rubber gave us silly putty.

But you can use a gpo to rename the local administrator account across your domain or rename it on single machines via lusrmgr.

Copy and paste the insightful comments from http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/11/19/1931231 to boost your karma!

But really, what would be the ethical implications of eating lab grown human tissue?

They probably would have got further making the request under the UK Data Protection Act.

We have something called the disability discrimination act here in the UK, which pretty much rules out many interesting uses of Javascript if things like screen readers can't process them, and if there's no other way of providing that enhanced functionality to disabled users.

As others have commented here, I'm not convinced that the Google feature is in fact much more than eye-candy; and thus, since it doesn't really add any functionality, isn't really covered by the DDA. However, as soon as it actually becomes useful for something, then it will be covered; and I don't fancy the job of getting JAWS or something like that to interpret the JS in a meaningful way!

Thanks for thinking of me, first. Have a great day.