Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Compare cell phone plans using Wirefly's innovative plan comparison tool ×

Comment Re:Think it through. (Score 1) 304

In one case, the cables included the name of a Saudi who was arrested for being gay. In Saudi Arabia, homosexuality is punishable by death.

As the person was already arrested, I assume the govt already knows their name and their punishment is already lined up. Making this info widely public is probably the only way anyone else will ever know what happened to this person.

Uh, what about persecution by his fellow Arab citizens, even if the government "cleared" this individual of being gay?

Losing his job? Losing his family? Losing his life? Are you saying that is it OK for these things to happen because "all information wants to be free?"

Complete freedom of information would probably work in an open, fair, and free society. Unfortunately, such a place does not exist. People are persecuted based on their age, color, gender, socioeconomic status, political views, medical history, sexual orientation, parents, ... just about everything. These are key concepts that the freedom of information proponents often overlook in their ideological zeal. Additionally, it is disappointing when they try to justify that, while their actions have ruined ruined individuals lives, it was for the greater cause... especially when such proponents keep their identities secret for their own safety. Hypocrites.


Comment Re:Proof of China's Superiority... (Score 1) 90

I'm not so sure you should dismiss the Chinese as mere copiers. That's a little facile. The Japanese used to be belittled as mere copiers, too, but that was always an unfair generalization. The Mitsubishi A6M "Zero" fighter was not a copy of anything. It was far superior to anything that any other Navy had. They developed a vastly superior aluminum alloy, 7075, in the middle of World War II. They had the only submarine Aircraft Carriers (I-400 class) in the world, and they were also the largest submarines in the world. They had by far the best torpedoes in the world. The MXY7 Ohka was a devastating rocket-powered, human-guided anti-ship missile.

Yes, China and Japan have in history (up to very recent history in the case of China) copied, and stolen, plenty of stuff from the US. But they also have made great native achievements.

Who already has the world's only anti-ship ballistic[*] missile? Gee ... China - the DF-21D. It can't be copied from the US, because we don't have anything like that.

[*] The "ballistic" part is a misnomer, because the missile has terminal maneuvering. But that is always how it is referred to as.

There is nothing new about this missile. It's a nuclear warhead on a missile with a guidance system.

Are you saying that is a new concept? If so, please explain how in detail.

Comment Re:Ignorant Posters (Score 1) 117

The article has been up for over 1.5 hours with 40 posts and no one has noticed that the first link isn't actually a link.

How do I submit an application for a Slashdot editor position? I'd love to do nothing all day and get paid for it.


This is /.

You're not supposed to read the articles. You're just supposed to post snarky comments about the OP's text!

Comment Re:Yay, hypocrisy. (Score 1) 644

What happened to "she's not fit" for the office? In the time since he said that about her, she's been shown to have been either wildly incompetent or ever more deceitful in her relationship with both her job and her supporters. What's she got on you, Bernie?

It may sting, but you have to consider the possibility that Sanders is just as much of career politician as Clinton. They have, after all, been involved in politics for the same amount of time.

Comment Re:Just one fatality (Score 1) 297

Getting distracted with Autopilot engaged is like removing your seatbelt because you have airbags.

I would argue that getting distracted with Autopilot engaged is a virtual certainty.

Unlike cruise control, the system completely takes control of the car from the driver. The driver is left with nothing to do but look at the scenery.

I think it would be incredibly difficult to remain completely alert, yet relaxed in this situation. I, personally, would either:
1. not trust the system and would be constantly stressed out that it was trying to kill me, or
2. would get overly comfortable, distract myself for increasing amounts of time, and then accidentally fall asleep or completely focus on a different task, like reading.

Realistically, neither of these options work for me. So I would not use autopilot unless it was functional at a level where it could actually fully drive the car and I was willing to cede it complete responsibility for my life.

Now I acknowledge that people are different and that some will be able to continuously stare at the road with complete attention while not driving. My wife for example is really good at this...

Comment Where is the proof-of-concept? (Score 2) 175

Am I the only one who thinks that the Hyperloop PR is getting a bit ahead of their actual potential?

Is it too much to ask to see a short section of Hyperloop actually built before talking about building a long section underground or the ocean?

As a child, I thought that those pneumatic tubes in the supermarket were the most awesome thing ever. (I still think that they are really cool!) And I think the hyperloop is a fantastic idea, but I would like to see concerns credibly addressed: (1) how will shifts in the tube alignment due to ground motion be addressed, (2) how will you pull a vacuum over a 1000-mile length of tubing, (3) what will it really feel like to be confined in a small windowless tube?, (4) instabilities are a big problem with aerodynamics - how much will the passenger be shaken around? (5) If there is a problem during transportation and the passenger-section of the tube gets stuck and loses pressure, the passengers will die in a vacuum right? (I know this is similar to an airplane failing, but dying underground, strapped into a dark tube seems even more unpleasant!)

My opinion is that the Hyperloop people are really doing their concept a disservice by not verifying that this concept will actually yield something usable for people at a small scale (either a short full-scale length or a sub-scale model) before proposing a huge investor-driven concept. It makes it seem like more of a boondoggle than an actual engineering concept.

Comment Re:Horrible in daylight (Score 1) 290

I have a late model car with one of those back-up cameras, which is displayed on an LCD display mounted in the dash. On a bright sunny day, when I'm backing into, say, a shaded parking spot, the cameras display in completely useless. The glare from the dashboard, hood, etc., completely drowns out the wimpy LCD display. In those cases, there's no way in hell I'm going to want a car without mirrors.

This is why we need to get rid of windows too. They can also be replaced with LCDs!

Comment Re:Requires data (Score 1) 136

It's useless if you don't have a data plan on your phone.

Google is actually letting you choose from several different methods including " tapping a Security Key, by entering a verification code sent to their phone or, starting today, by approving a prompt like the one below that will pop up on their phone." So they are not requiring a data connection.

Ref: http://googleappsupdates.blogs...

Comment Re:I am not sur this is an improvement (Score 1) 136

I like the current setup as it does not require my phone to have a data connection. Not everywhere I have a computer connected to the internet do I have wifi available. The app generating a code seems more flexible in my opinion.

Google is actually letting you choose from several different methods including " tapping a Security Key, by entering a verification code sent to their phone or, starting today, by approving a prompt like the one below that will pop up on their phone." So they are not requiring a data connection.

Ref: http://googleappsupdates.blogs...

Comment Re:Explanation: Protects rental stock (Score 1) 211

. The cities become just a resort in this case, instead of what they should be: A place where people can live within an hour or two commute of their workplace affordably.

If that is the case, cities like San Francisco and New York should not try to bill themselves as a "tourist destination".

What you currently have is a city that (1) desires financial revenue from tourists, (2) has extremely high hotel rates, and (3) appears to be blocking non-corporate entities from renting out their apartments at all.

I think that most people would agree that it is OK for individuals to be able to rent out their unoccupied apartment on an incidental basis, but not OK for individuals to hoard multiple properties just for rental in such a way that it drives up prices for residents. But this law just bans all private rentals (in favor of the corporate lobby maintaining high hotel prices) and does not accommodate incidental rental incidences.

My personal opinion is that issues like this should be addressed on a building by building basis and specified in the owner's association rules for each building. Then the residents can choose what type of building environment they want. But when the law is specified by the government in such a heavyhanded way, it reeks of overreach and corporate lobbying.

Comment Re:Two Word Solution (Score 1) 224

Paint balls.

Or alternatively, if paint balls prove ineffective, 4 digits.


Of course, depending on the degree of hardening of the cameras' enclosures, it's possible that two digits and two letters may suffice.



Yes. Firing a high-power rifle round or a shotgun blast in the air, with no backstop, is a fantastic idea. Especially in an urban environment.

That's the third thing they teach you not to do with guns. Right after "don't put your finger on the trigger if you don't want to fire the gun" and "don't look down the barrel."

When you miss and that round kills someone a mile away in their apartment, or all the little shotgun pellets ricochet back and blind you and other, the FBI will use that as an excuse to install more cameras, while limiting your access to firearms.

Why don't you do something even more intelligent? Dress up like a utility worker, get a ladder, and just remove the camera?

Slashdot Top Deals

How many weeks are there in a light year?