Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - SPAM: A Helium-Resistant Material Could Finally Usher in The Age of Nuclear Fusion

schwit1 writes: A collaboration of engineers and researchers has found a way to prevent helium, a byproduct of the fusion reaction, from weakening nuclear fusion reactors.

The secret is in building the reactors using nanocomposite solids that create channels through which the helium can escape.

Not only does the fusion process expose reactors to extreme pressure and temperatures, helium — the byproduct of fusion between hydrogen atoms — adds to the strain placed on reactors by bubbling out into the materials and eventually weakening them.

"Literally, you get these helium bubbles inside of the metal that stay there forever because the metal is solid," Michael Demkowicz, Texas A&M materials science and engineering associate professor, said in a press release.

"As you accumulate more and more helium, the bubbles start to link up and destroy the entire material."

In a study published in the journal Science Advances, the researchers overview how they tested the behavior of helium in nanocomposite solids, materials made from thick metal layer stacks. They found that the helium didn't form bubbles in these nanocomposite solids like it did in traditionally used materials. Instead, it formed long, vein-like tunnels.

Link to Original Source

Submission + - Pentagon Exposed Huge Amounts of Web-Monitoring Data On Amazon Server (theregister.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: Three misconfigured AWS S3 buckets have been discovered wide open on the public internet containing "dozens of terabytes" of social media posts and similar pages – all scraped from around the world by the U.S. military to identify and profile persons of interest. The archives were found by veteran security breach hunter UpGuard's Chris Vickery during a routine scan of open Amazon-hosted data silos, and these ones weren't exactly hidden. The buckets were named centcom-backup, centcom-archive, and pacom-archive. CENTCOM is the common abbreviation for the U.S. Central Command, which controls army operations in the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia. PACOM is the name for U.S. Pacific Command, covering the rest of southern Asia, China and Australasia.

"For the research I downloaded 400GB of samples but there were many terabytes of data up there," he said. "It's mainly compressed text files that can expand out by a factor of ten so there's dozens and dozens of terabytes out there and that's a conservative estimate." Just one of the buckets contained 1.8 billion social media posts automatically fetched over the past eight years up to today. It mainly contains postings made in central Asia, however Vickery noted that some of the material is taken from comments made by American citizens. The databases also reveal some interesting clues as to what this information is being used for. Documents make reference to the fact that the archive was collected as part of the U.S. government's Outpost program, which is a social media monitoring and influencing campaign designed to target overseas youths and steer them away from terrorism.

Submission + - Microsoft and GitHub Team Up To Take Git Virtual File System To MacOS, Linux (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader writes: One of the more surprising stories of the past year was Microsoft's announcement that it was going to use the Git version control system for Windows development. Microsoft had to modify Git to handle the demands of Windows development but said that it wanted to get these modifications accepted upstream and integrated into the standard Git client. That plan appears to be going well. Yesterday, the company announced that GitHub was adopting its modifications and that the two would be working together to bring suitable clients to macOS and Linux. Microsoft says that, so far, about half of its modifications have been accepted upstream, with upstream Git developers broadly approving of the approach the company has taken to improve the software's scaling. Redmond also says that it has been willing to make changes to its approach to satisfy the demands of upstream Git. The biggest complexity is that Git has a very conservative approach to compatibility, requiring that repositories remain compatible across versions.

Microsoft and GitHub are also working to bring similar capabilities to other platforms, with macOS coming first, and later Linux. The obvious way to do this on both systems is to use FUSE, an infrastructure for building file systems that run in user mode rather than kernel mode (desirable because user-mode development is easier and safer than kernel mode). However, the companies have discovered that FUSE isn't fast enough for this—a lesson Dropbox also learned when developing a similar capability, Project Infinite. Currently, the companies believe that tapping into a macOS extensibility mechanism called Kauth (or KAuth) will be the best way forward.

Submission + - Grad Students are freaking out over House Tax Bill... (nytimes.com)

Camel Pilot writes: And they should be.

The new GOP Tax Plan, which just passed the House, will tax Tuition Waivers as income.
Graduate Students working as Research Assistants on meager stipends would have to declare Tuition Waivers as income on the order of $70K income. This will force many Graduate Students of modest means to quit their career paths and walk away from their research. These are the next generation of scientist, engineers, inventors, educators, medical miracle workers and market makers. As Prof Claus Wilke points out "This would be a disaster for US STEM Ph.D. education"

Submission + - SFLC vs. Conservancy - Trademark conflict over SOFTWARE FREEDOM (lunduke.com)

curcuru writes: The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) has petitioned to cancel the trademark registration of the Software Freedom Conservancy (Conservancy). No matter how you look at it, this kind of lawsuit is a loss for software freedom and open source in general, since this kind of USPTO trademark petition (like a lawsuit) will tie up both organizations, leaving less time and funds to help FOSS projects.

There's clearly more to the issue than the trademark issue; the many community member's blog posts make that clear.

The key point in this USPTO lawsuit is that the legal aspects aren't actually important. What's most important is the community reaction: since SFLC and Conservancy are both non-profits who help serve free software communities, it's the community perception of what organizations to look to for help that matters. SFLC's attempt to take away the Conservancy's very name doesn't look good for them.

Bryan Lunduke's video today covers the whole case, including his investigation into the two organizations and their funding.

Comment Re:These are the projects SFC represents (Score 2) 113

Member projects of Conservancy don't have to sign over copyrights or other assets, but are welcome to. Many projects don't assign copyright, and that's fine. But as a 501C3, whatever assets a project does sign over to Conservancy will be managed by Conservancy in line with their charitable mission.

Details of services Conservancy offers to their projects are posted pretty clearly: https://sfconservancy.org/projects/apply/. Project governance and licensing are also mostly project decisions, as long as it's an OSI/FSF approved license.

This trademark cancellation petition does not affect member projects directly - however if (for some strange reason) the registration actually were cancelled, arguably the Conservancy might be forced to change the trademark it uses for itself in the US. Thankfully, Conservancy has a registration in the EU as well.

Comment Re:These are the projects SFC represents (Score 1) 113

A key issue is that the SFLC directly helped to spin off and incorporate the Conservancy, and assisted the Conservancy in applying to register the SOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY® trademark in the US. So it's kind of odd to see the SFLC now - after 6 years - directly appealing to the USPTO to cancel Conservancy's registration without even talking to them first.

To see why this is important, imagine that someone not related to your project, but that had a somewhat-similar trademark registration, suddenly filed to cancel your project's registration. Lawyering up is all fine and good, but it's expensive if the TTAB case actually goes anywhere, and if you lose... you lose your name. The TTAB doesn't work like normal federal courts.

For those interested in the factual history (with sources) behind the registration at question: https://communityovercode.com/2017/11/software-freedom-trademark-timeline/

Comment Re:The Linux Foundation != Linux (Score 1) 284

Not that slashdot threads normally want to hear more facts, but...
  • The LF effectively controls the use of the LINUX registered trademark (which is legally owned by Linus), plus, quoting:
  • "The Linux Foundation provides a neutral home where Linux kernel development can be protected and supported for years to come.
  • Linux Foundation fellowships sponsor the work of Linux creator Linus Torvalds and lead maintainer Greg Kroah-Hartman
  • Linux Foundation IT operations run the systems behind Linux kernel development on kernel.org
  • Linux Foundation Training offers free and paid training courses and Linux certifications
  • Linux Foundation Events organize gatherings where kernel developers can collaborate"

So while the people who run the business operations (like Jim) may not hack, the organization they run and budget they control does help fund kernel development directly.
Also, the ASF is a 501C3 public charity - completely different governance than the 501C6 non-profits like LF (essentially top sponsors pay for board seats) and Eclipse (a mix of sponsored/elected board seats).

Comment Well, they are the event producers (Score 1) 284

The Linux Foundation has their own internal events division, and they produce both their own events as well as are contracted to produce some events for other organizations: http://events.linuxfoundation.... Obviously, the hotel physically provided the projectors, screens, etc., but it's the LF events team doing all the rest. The LF normally provides a .PPT slide template deck for speakers, although it's not required.

Comment Re:He side-steps the issue, confronts a bigger one (Score 1) 302

It is what it is. Just be aware that while Ubuntu may be open source and have community governance participation, it's still partially a Canonical-driven project. That's fine, and the partnership has certainly gotten Ubuntu further (in terms of impact on the world in general) than it would have without a direct commercial driver. It's always interesting seeing these things from the Apache perspective (which on the technical side is quite different from linux distros, I admit). Apache projects themselves are required to act independently. But that in no way means that the projects don't have a lot of drivers from commercial interests. It's just that the Apache board is a stop to any one commercial interest being the sole driver. In any case, while personally I'm interested in the ubergeek commentary from Ubuntu insiders and /.ers, I'm professionally interested in communities that can tell a story to the world at large. Someday an linux distro will be something commonplace in the average human's life - and in a way that the human is actually aware of it. Perhaps Android is starting on that front, in terms of the human awareness of it.

Comment Re:Why not merge? (Score 1) 266

It's the licenses, Anonymous Coward. AOO only uses the Apache License, and doesn't care what license anyone else uses. LO only uses the GPL, and wants everyone to use *only* the GPL. The AOO project is happy to accept contributions from anyone - including LO folks - but only under our license.

Comment Re:who cares? (Score 1) 266

Yeah, as Palestrina notes, the AOO project provides the raw numbers for actual downloads. You can even get the source for generating the numbers: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/ooo/devtools/aoo-stats Apples to apples is difficult to get to. I mean, seriously: of all those LO's bundled with linux distros, how many are being actively used? It's like getting a copy of IE with a Windows build. Aren't most cool /. people the type who use perl and pipes instead of spreadsheets anyway? 8->

Comment Re:OpenOffice dot org - Apache OpenOffice (Score 5, Informative) 266

The official name of the new ASF project (and the software it ships) is Apache OpenOffice. While the ASF now legally owns the trademarks associated with OpenOffice.org, going forward we'll be using Apache OpenOffice as our trademark. While normally we require Apache projects to live at an *.apache.org domain name, given the broad (non-technical) end-user base of AOO they will still provide a user-based homepage at openoffice.org. Developers should probably go to openoffice.apache.org for technical info. ---- I'm not a lawyer, but I was an Apache OpenOffice podling mentor

Slashdot Top Deals

"Nuclear war can ruin your whole compile." -- Karl Lehenbauer

Working...