Comment Re:Really, they should make it easier to do (Score 2) 778
JS Switch
If nourishment were universally replicable, would we not consider this a good thing? Why should intellectual nourishment be any different?
Well, the argument I've heard most often is basically
Replicable --> Lower Price --> Lower motivation to create more
I think the main difference in the analogy is the level of which we expect 'more' to mean 'new'. i.e. 'more'/replicated food is good, and if that means less creation, so be it, as most don't usually expect something new;
vs. 'more'/replicated software/art/'IP' is good, but most expect 'progress' in these areas, which would be faster with limited/controlled replication to create motivation to make 'new'.
I'm open to critiques of this idea, though.
"It is hard to overstate the debt that we owe to men and women of genius." -- Robert G. Ingersoll