Comment Re:Really, they should make it easier to do (Score 2) 778
JS Switch
If nourishment were universally replicable, would we not consider this a good thing? Why should intellectual nourishment be any different?
Well, the argument I've heard most often is basically
Replicable --> Lower Price --> Lower motivation to create more
I think the main difference in the analogy is the level of which we expect 'more' to mean 'new'. i.e. 'more'/replicated food is good, and if that means less creation, so be it, as most don't usually expect something new;
vs. 'more'/replicated software/art/'IP' is good, but most expect 'progress' in these areas, which would be faster with limited/controlled replication to create motivation to make 'new'.
I'm open to critiques of this idea, though.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. -- John Kenneth Galbraith