Comment Re:Sgt Schultz: "I see nothing! I hear nothing!" (Score 1) 77
Oh, like when the DC (and so many other cities') police stopped reporting crime?
You linked to an article that does not support your lie; I just read the article, but it seems that you either did not read it, or you're an even worse liar than you first appeared to be. The article you linked to is about a police officer who was a "whistle blower" and claimed that managers within the Washington D.C. police department were down-grading crimes (and pushing for their subordinates to do the same) so that they could get promoted (etc.) for lower crime numbers. While these practices are dishonest and hurt the policing effort, this is a far cry from "police stopped reporting crime".
But since you're a MAGA, I guess any lie is a fair play for you as long as it's in service of your shitler führer.
Comment Re: Are there people in the government (Score 4, Insightful) 77
The UFC fights were paid for by UFC, no federal taxpayer dollars.
There is no evidence that the UFC is paying for the full cost of the event. US taxpayers are on the hook for this, and the UFC will pay some portion of the cost of this inbred hillbilly shindig.
Trump is busy making our nations capitol beautiful for our 250th
Holy shit you are one stupid ass-licker.
Comment Re:Anyone... (Score 1) 153
Comment Inconceivable (Score 2) 153
Comment Re:another EditorDavid failure (Score 1) 91
EditorDavid doesn't know what an editor does.
They publish puff pieces for GM?
Comment Re: expectations (Score 1) 91
Comment Re:expectations (Score 1) 91
Comment Re:What a strange cycle (Score 1) 66
Comment Re:Go back to COBOL (Score 1) 66
Comment Re:I'm wetting my pants now (Score 1) 66
I have no idea why this Java "version" thing is even an issue on the internet. No one talks about C++ or C# issues, because there are none.
C++ broke bigly going from 16- to 32-bit Windows, and again going from 32-bit to 64-bit Windows. And a lot of code that people had written broke bigly, too. But it was possible to write code in a very careful way to not break across these changes, which most people only figured out after the fact.
As for C#, it used to break every single application with every single C# release. Backwards compatibility completely sucked with C#. I haven't used it now in over a decade, but even by then they had started making compatibility a goal, and things had settled down quite a bit since the early "break everything always" days.
Almost all Java 1.0 code written in '95, on the other hand, still runs fine today on Java 27 or whatever the latest version is.
Comment Re:I'm wetting my pants now (Score 1) 66
Comment Re:I'm wetting my pants now (Score 1) 66
Moving off a platform that auto-expires constantly in order to force you to migrate to a newer ($$$) platform that will also auto-expire shortly after you move to it does seem to be a good idea.
Java 8 (cost: $0) will continue to work forever, so long as you keep running it on the same OS and hardware. It just won't be patched to support new features, new OS versions, or to fix security flaws. It's just like Windows 95 is no longer supported. This really isn't hard to understand.
For reference, we recently declared VC++ 6.0, from 1998, unsupported, not because there's a problem with it but because getting it to run under the latest Win11 is too hard. Having said that, binaries built using VC++ 6.0 still run fine under the latest Win11, and that's a nearly 30-year-old dev.system which, admittedly, is quite a bit better than what MS is shipping today.
With very few exceptions, Java code written in 1995 still runs without modification today. That's 31 years, and counting. Not bad for a free platform.
Comment Re:What will he do with that money? (Score 5, Insightful) 315
Purchase the government of the United States
He already did that, in 2024, for only $277 million. As a reward, he was given control over what parts of the government to kill, and he killed off all the parts that were investigating the crimes committed by his businesses.