Much of the internet runs on ad revenue..
And people go to fewer and fewer websites. Gone are the days that people just browsed around on websites. Social media feeds you what you want now.
So yeah, it's time for a business model disruption.

Big AI companies can now own a new window to all apps. Making ad revenue hard to share.

I wonder if it would make sense for a company like Signal to have servers in both AWS and Azure. Thus lowering the chances of a full crash. At least have a degraded speed mode or something.

But at some scale hosting your own servers becomes cheaper. And you use AWS as your backup.

OpenAi was founded as a non-profit to develop OPEN AI tech for all. So that companies like Google wouldn't monopolize that field.

Instead it closed the door. Other companies followed suit.

Except this little company in China that keeps delivering bombshells and sharing tricks with the world.
Good for DeepSeek. Open source lovers around the world should be appreciative.

Did you read the paper?

The paper is about whether we reinforce it to answer correctly (whatever that means) vs it simply saying "I don't know".

Most LLMs are rewarded when they give a correct answer. Say: 1 for correct, and 0 for incorrect.
So they are rewarded to always try an answer even when they aren't certain. The paper suggests rewarding "I don't know". For example, you could give 0.2 points for saying "I don't know", 0 for incorrect, and 1 for correct. This way the model will try to answer but only when it meets a certain threshold.

All generative models are generative. What they generate is the most probably text. What you consider as most probable text would depend on several factors (esp. the data set). But during the reinforcement learning phase they can teach it to say "I don't know" so it plays nicer with humans that expect answers that are more than just gramatically correct.

Ok sure. It doesn't need to absolve them. But you might as well settle to pay for the license to the materials and keep your datasets.

Why would they destroy their datasets? The settlement should have covered the purchase price for those materials.

I guess this is a good compromise that protects both parties.

Assuming that even if Apple discontinues Apple TV or whatever, you can still play your movie.

So are you saying Mark Zuckerberg is suing Mark Zuckerberg or that Mark Zuckerberg is suing Mark Zuckerberg?

I hope Amazon loses this case. This opens the door to all sorts of abuse.
Buying is buying.

I certainly hope my email filters ALL political garbage.. I don't want any political parties sending me emails.

The most popular battery chemistry today is LFP, and it doesn't use cobalt.

Slapstick does. I remember Airplane and Top Secret did quite well because the comedy was easy to translate.

People wanted Tesla's it was the iPhone of EVs. People would buy other brands because they couldn't afford a Tesla.

But Tesla was the disruptive product. Now, with the brand damage, people have no exciting brand to turn to. So yes, I think it does hurt all EVs in general.

"However, quantum computing can, in theory, solve certain NP complete problem in polynomial time."

If you can solve one NP complete problem in polynomial time, you can solve them all.

Quantum computers can't solve NP complete problems in polynomial time. That is incorrect.
But it can solve some other troublesome problems that can't be solved in polynomial time with a conventional computer.

Based on the prompts you give them they act the way you prompt them.

They are very good at playing the part. And it's often convincing.