Fuck, some of us are stuck with it cause we got users... but you know what this means??? Bye bye mother fuckin Xbox uwp you can't remove!!!

What about Freecad? Best I can tell it works fine on RPi.

I'm in a very similar situation. My son and I are perfectly happy with Google Fi with our Nexus 5x phones. My daughter wanted an iphone, wife needed better coverage (she spends a lot of time in areas that are only served by AT&T). I bought my daughter a $150 iPhone 5C at Walmart, wife a $150 Asus phone on Amazon, and they're both on Walmart Straight Talk with bills at around $45 each per month. Not quite a cheap as Google Fi, but they've got what they want.

I've got a Sager Clevo gaming notebook with an 860M, and there's nothing to hate about it. It lasts a long time on a charge. It plays most games at their highest res. It runs Linux great. It's light, with an SSD for the OS drive. It runs two external monitors when I'm using it for work. It has no DVD, so it's lightweight. It doesn't run the Nvidia card when I'm not playing 3d games (uses the onboard Intel graphics). This GTX980 on a Clevo would likely have all those same benefits. You folks trash talking gaming notebooks are nuts.

Never take programming or programming-career advice from someone who doesn't know that Java and JavaScript are completely different languages.

I spend my days coding webapps in vim on a widescreen portrait, the browser in a widescreen landscape, and usually a 3rd monitor to the side with email and chat windows. I can fit over 100 lines of code on the portrait monitor. The future is now, man.

Would it be proper for the judge to demand passwords to the FB accounts of the pertinent employees of the Honeybaked Ham Co.? Wouldn't access to their accounts be equally valuable for deciding the case? Why is the female plaintiff the only one subject to turning over access to all FB communications?

The Doctor Pwn's the OSX, he keeps his license. The Doctor Pwn's the iOS via Safari, he keeps his license. The Doctor Pwn's Apple's walled garden, and they take his license.

Where's the love for Bill Joy? Vim is great and all, as are all the ports of vi, the plugins that give vi functionality to eclipse, firefox, etc... But really, isn't Bill the real hero here?

I use in in windows via cygwin, I use it on every linux server, desktop, and laptop I work on. I use it on my phone. I use it on my tablet. Vi's focus on dual modes, and no mouse, is just wonderful.

Thanks for vi Bill!

Nothing like a martyr for the cause.

His name was Robert Paulson.

And it becomes slow, unresponsive, and costly. ...
Nope. No Surprises here.

I spend a week a year listening to crap like this for hour after hour. In 2010 everyone said (and still this year the big Security firms are still clueless) that the PLC attack against the Siemens controllers "Was an extremely sophisticated attack" blah blah blah "nation state" blah blah blah.

This is based on the following:
1. Obviously the 2 signed pieces of code would have required real human assets.
2. The PLC controllers are incredible sophisticated and expensive.
3. The method of infiltration was extremely well planned.

Until earlier this year I was spouting the same crap... then an individual busted Comodo wide open. Then later Diginotar (as if Comodo wasn't evidence enough.) SO Check, #1 no longer requires human assets.
Then I saw a talk that blew #2 and #3 out of the water. A relatively low funded talk ( about 6k) was done, where an individual (not a team, not even two people) was able to identify a direct backdoor that provided shell access into all PLCs of the model applicable in the Stuxnet attack, and could perform the attack without the need of the configuration stations...

THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A USB PAYLOAD TO BOOTSTRAP THE COMPILER! You could actually login, and patch the damn executables on the plc itself using the backdoor.

My conclusion about 30 seconds after these things were demonstrated (on the actual PLCs) was that it probably did take a team of engineers to create the rube goldberg that was stuxnet, but it didn't involve anyone at Siemens (since when confronted with the researchers findings, they acknowledged them, saying they were already aware.)

Since the RSA attack is like three steps down from that, I would say that RSA is trying to perform damage control with their shareholders since in terms of sophistication a user clicking a malicious URL in an email is sooooOoo 1999.

It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
    To call upon a neighbour and to say: --
"We invaded you last night--we are quite prepared to fight,
    Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
    And the people who ask it explain
That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
    And then you'll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
    To puff and look important and to say: --
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
    We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
    But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
    You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
    For fear they should succumb and go astray;
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
    You will find it better policy to say: --

"We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
    No matter how trifling the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
    And the nation that pays it is lost!"