Comment Re:Bandwidth ? (Score 1) 167
Generating a picture in full HD requires 1920 x 1080 = 2,073,600 pixels.
This gives 36 megabytes per picture.
Now, you have to create 25 pictures for one second.
It may be faster to compute digital animation, but you still have a large IO problem...
Sorry to interrupt your otherwise fine take with actual data, but here's the facts.
Because the final piece was destined for a landing page we rendered at 720, layered EXRs at more like 13mb per frame. We only needed 24 fps.
The IO was no big deal, since we were copying the frames down as they rendered. Our download speed was fast enough to keep up with the ec2 farm.
The theory behind your point is sound, and is the main reason we didn't go with a 3rd party service. We've certainly been burned when the download took 3 times longer than the render. But amazon has great throughput and the whole thing was really smooth.
In case you want to see the finished animation, it's here:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/home-users/unfold-whats-possible.html