Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:I did (Score 0) 233

Here's something at the department of labor that directly contradicts what you just said.

now i know that the fact that this is on the actualy DoL website is a problem for you, you didn't have it foxsplained to you on oreally or something. i'll wait for you to tell me how they're lying, i'm not actually reading it correctly , blah blah blah.

yeah- so the thing that gets me about you right wing nut jobs is how you so very consistently flat out lie.

and you do it because it works really well.

especially on this site.

and always with the leftist religion thing. is that some new libertarian right wing meme that i missed ?

Comment Re:Wikileaks (Score 1) 211

LOLOLOLOL. oh the shit that gets uprated on slashdot.

you show us "evidence" that journalists collude with Clinton.

what the fuck. a bunch of shit that looks like bad photoshops qualifies as evidence now ?


and let me get this right. if i say that Breitbart news is highly biased and the accuracy of their stories highly suspect you get to immediately declare victory ?

and you get uprated for this right wing wet-dream posting ?

not hilarious. fucking depressing.

Comment Re:I hope those in power learned (Score 1) 442

they are neither idiots nor ill informed by and large

really, you don't think they are ill-informed ?

the people voting for brexit swallowed flat-out lies wholesale.
53% of the republicans in the US think Trump won the popular vote.

they absolutely ARE ill-informed, they choose to be, and it's killing democracy.

Comment the routine exaggeration (Score 1) 569

of everything she has done wrong, and the relentless pursuit of "where's there's smoke there's fire" witchhunting without any substantial evidence has got me convinced that this really is a witchhunt.

I wasn't too excited about her before, but at this point, I'm positively thrilled.

meanwhile the fake billionaire who wants to instutionalize racism gets far less negative press. i haven't seen or heard one interview that's gone after the Trump campaign morons with 1/2 the gusto i've seen that they go after the most trivial details of what Clinton has allegedly done.

if she can put up with all this bullshit she deserves the job, she's definitely got the temperment for it.

Comment uh, he don't care about no stinking ethics (Score 1) 120

Then the question was, ethically, should we?

yeah- i'm sure he wrestled with that mightily.

what he wrestled with was the financial implications. Somehow they came to the conclusion that it would cost them more money to go ahead and break into that phone- probably because they'd have to start doing it all the time.

That's how that decision got made, not because of anything soft and fuzzy like ethics.

Slashdot Top Deals

The other line moves faster.