Comment Re:Cargo = BOMBS (Score 1) 133
I was thinking the same thing. And no doubt the Russians and Chinese have the same thoughts.
I live about 6 miles from a abandoned ICBM site in Arizona and at the time (until '83) the Titan II missile carried the largest yield single warhead..ever. It was a "known measly 9 megatons (and a mass of 9 tons) of nuclear goodby. While it seems small compared to 100tons of whatever, a 9 megaton nuclear pop pretty much stamps out a 50 mile flat radius and there is still a website that will calculate it for you.
While the Russians developed the largest nuclear warhead ever at 50 megatons. it was scary and quite useless in a war as no plane, jet or missile could handle or carry it.
But a rocket/missle which can carry 100 tonnes of nuclear bombastardly pop, would allow Presidents, and Chairmen to poop pants once again.
But it would also create another round a missile envy, followed by bomb envy, and letting the opposition go with the "largest missile" in its pants, would almost have to force another arms race and while it could create a hugh fleet of missiles to launch to Mars for future inhabitants, its more likely many would be set aside for a "just in case" reason. But another good reason to go to Mars.
The Armed Service though, will expect it to carry the next generation of tanks or aircraft which can be bundles up and sent to a Army in need, somewhere within an hour, and as pointed out, a large number of "not good things" with a destination other than where the rocket may land is another likely job.
Funding this this though, is a sure way to signal your intention for another "big missile" race, which sounds very manly, but make you lose more sleep than ever, with a hope that climate change as our big problem is not forgotten by mankind in a matter of milliseconds