What kind of weird tax write-off rules are those? I'd expect that if you spend $x million making (and possibly marketing) a thing, and then only get $y by selling/renting/... it, you'd write off ($x-$y), no matter if $y is exactly zero or just smaller than $x. What rule is is that requires the thing to be essentially destroyed?

The coreutils are surprisingly complex. If you know a little about kernel functions, it feels like any of those tools should basically map to just a single kernel call. The requirements of the POSIX-standard(s) that define how exactly the tools should work, including how they should handle and report errors, as well as limitations of filesystems (such as long filenames, unsupported characters, ACLs) make correct implementations quite a chore. I'm wondering if the rust implementations pass the test suite that's included in the gnu coreutils source. Does anyone here know?

Try the videos by Benn Jordan, who is in my opinion at least partially responsible for starting the anti-Flock-sentiment.

That may not be as smart an idea as you think, since there are a few code execution vulnerabilities in the OS. Not sure if any of them are remotely exploitable, of if any of those used by GamersNexus have been patched.

posting to undo incorrect moderation

replying to undo incorrect moderation.

If you're asking me, *positive* prices are a bigger problem. Actually having to pay for electricity is outrageous. Negative prices for a few hours on a few sunny days are negligible compared to the effect that positive prices have on the economy basically all year round.

The judgement apparently wasn't based on calculated risk due to long term low intensity exposure, but instead studies that show that pilots and flight attendants have a significantly higher risk of radiation-related cancer deaths than other professions.

That has already happened. Air Canada was found to be legally liable for information provided by their AI.

That's "high severity," as in e.g. code execution. Ghostscript is a candidate for code execution by just displaying a PDF or printing a postscript file. Ghostscript as an external filter for PS, PDF etc. may still be part of the default installation of ImageMagick on many Linux distributions.

You'll have to enter that prompt at https://gemini.google.com/ and apparently you need to be logged in with a google account to actually take that practice test. Google search only returns the links you mentioned.

The quote here on slashdot is literally what's in the financial times article:

That indicates that the chip is 0.7 mm, but it makes no claim whatsoever about the antenna and potentially other electronics (e.g. capacitors) that may be included in the full device. I'd assume that the antenna covers the back of the entire label.

No, it doesn't. Semis are already available that can easily drive fully loaded for the maximum time allowed between mandatory breaks, and recharge more than enough during that break for the next shift segment. And at least in Europe, the charging infrastructure is a non-issue as well.

They will pay. If they don't, the plaintiff can submit a simple form, and the bailiff will show up at one of Facebook's offices and seize assets to be auctioned off to cover both the full amount of the ruling, the plaintiff's lawyers' fees as well as fees for his own work. Messing with any of the seized assets is of course a felony. If they don't let him in or attempt to prevent him from doing his work, he'll be back with police, or simply seize their entire bank accounts until this is settled.

[quote]It's not an edge case where something really unusual didn't register - it was a road obstruction. It doesn't matter if it's a barricade, a kid on a bike, or the Ghost of Christmas Past - if there's something in the way, do not hit it. [/quote] I's not as clear cut as you present it. An autonomous ca should not hit the brakes hard for a variety of soft, light objects that the wind might blow into is path, such as leaves or garbage such as plastic bags. I think there may be enough overlap with the characteristics of the caution tape for the latter to be mistaken for a non-obstruction. Still not a good excuse for this failure.