If you're asking me, *positive* prices are a bigger problem. Actually having to pay for electricity is outrageous. Negative prices for a few hours on a few sunny days are negligible compared to the effect that positive prices have on the economy basically all year round.

The judgement apparently wasn't based on calculated risk due to long term low intensity exposure, but instead studies that show that pilots and flight attendants have a significantly higher risk of radiation-related cancer deaths than other professions.

That has already happened. Air Canada was found to be legally liable for information provided by their AI.

That's "high severity," as in e.g. code execution. Ghostscript is a candidate for code execution by just displaying a PDF or printing a postscript file. Ghostscript as an external filter for PS, PDF etc. may still be part of the default installation of ImageMagick on many Linux distributions.

You'll have to enter that prompt at https://gemini.google.com/ and apparently you need to be logged in with a google account to actually take that practice test. Google search only returns the links you mentioned.

The quote here on slashdot is literally what's in the financial times article:

That indicates that the chip is 0.7 mm, but it makes no claim whatsoever about the antenna and potentially other electronics (e.g. capacitors) that may be included in the full device. I'd assume that the antenna covers the back of the entire label.

No, it doesn't. Semis are already available that can easily drive fully loaded for the maximum time allowed between mandatory breaks, and recharge more than enough during that break for the next shift segment. And at least in Europe, the charging infrastructure is a non-issue as well.

They will pay. If they don't, the plaintiff can submit a simple form, and the bailiff will show up at one of Facebook's offices and seize assets to be auctioned off to cover both the full amount of the ruling, the plaintiff's lawyers' fees as well as fees for his own work. Messing with any of the seized assets is of course a felony. If they don't let him in or attempt to prevent him from doing his work, he'll be back with police, or simply seize their entire bank accounts until this is settled.

[quote]It's not an edge case where something really unusual didn't register - it was a road obstruction. It doesn't matter if it's a barricade, a kid on a bike, or the Ghost of Christmas Past - if there's something in the way, do not hit it. [/quote] I's not as clear cut as you present it. An autonomous ca should not hit the brakes hard for a variety of soft, light objects that the wind might blow into is path, such as leaves or garbage such as plastic bags. I think there may be enough overlap with the characteristics of the caution tape for the latter to be mistaken for a non-obstruction. Still not a good excuse for this failure.

No, it can't. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... connector ("Type 1") used in the US doesn't even have the pins for 3 phase power, it uses 1 phase and neutral, or a second phase instead of neutral. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ("Type 2") connector used in Europe can carry 3 phase power, but the power supply to actually deal with it is optional for those vehicles where it is available at all.

It looks like you have not understood how DC fast charging works. When in DC mode, the charger (power supply) in the vehicle is bypassed entirely, and, after some safety checks and handshakes, the battery is connected directly to the socket and thereby the charging station. For NACS, you probably need extra switching circuitry to disconnect the vehicle side power supply, because it would probably be unhappy when fed 400V DC.

So you think the unions will insist that their members continue handling toxic, flammable substances?

What noise? Modern Trains are certainly less noisy than an equivalent number of cars or trucks. Regarding braking, modern passenger trains as well as the latest freight cars use disk brakes that are much quieter than the old style brake pads that use the wheels' running surface.

Nobody claimed that this solves all problems. Let's also not pretend your continued ownership and use of cars solves all problems.

That's incorrect. The president of Germany is elected by the Federal Convention, which is made up of all members of the German Federal Diet (Deutscher Bundestag, elected by proportional representation every four years) plus the same number of representatives elected by the states' parliaments. Therefore, half of the result is determined by indirect vote, and the other half by double indirect votes (populace votes for representatives in the state parliament, those vote for representatives in the Federal Convention, and that in turn votes for the president). There is however, no popular vote at all for the president, the elections for the president don't coincide with any federal or state elections. Few people really care, because the president usually has a much lower profile than the chancellor..

The only thing about this story that keeps people in Cupertino awake ist the simple fact that people could use this vulnerability to reset the charge counter of the battery and try to file a warranty claim.

Sadly. that's not the case.

• (1) No liability for taking down generally. — Subject to paragraph (2), a service provider shall not be liable to any person for any claim based on the service provider's good faith disabling of access to, or removal of, material or activity claimed to be infringing or based on facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent, regardless of whether the material or activity is ultimately determined to be infringing.
• (2) Exception. — Paragraph (1) shall not apply with respect to material residing at the direction of a subscriber of the service provider on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider that is removed, or to which access is disabled by the service provider, pursuant to a notice provided under subsection (c)(1)(C), unless the service provider —
  • (A) takes reasonable steps promptly to notify the subscriber that it has removed or disabled access to the material;
  • (B) upon receipt of a counter notification described in paragraph (3), promptly provides the person who provided the notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) with a copy of the counter notification, and informs that person that it will replace the removed material or cease disabling access to it in 10 business days; and
  • (C) replaces the removed material and ceases disabling access to it not less than 10, nor more than 14, business days following receipt of the counter notice, unless its designated agent first receives notice from the person who submitted the notification under subsection (c)(1)(C) that such person has filed an action seeking a court order to restrain the subscriber from engaging in infringing activity relating to the material on the service provider's system or network.

And if that doesn't help, there's certainly something in youtube's terms and conditions that they can host or not host anything they want at any time they want for any or no reason, and that it is your own fault to rely on their services. I'd expect their liability to be limited to what you pay them for hosting your content, some very low symbolic amount or just plain nothing, whichever they can get away with in the relevant jurisdiction.