"The more you tighten your grip, Governor Tarkin..."
"The more you tighten your grip, Governor Tarkin..."
I think I've seen more Ford tractors around than John Deere. With this, I expect that to become even more true.
It appears that Bitcoin, a currency designed with anonymity in mind...
No. Bitcoin is designed around decentralization, not anonymity. Every transaction is logged forever; for anonymity, that's a nightmare. This misconception is widespread. Bitcoin is not anonymous; if privacy is important to you, you should not be using it.
Except that human civilization has been grain based for millennia. (Indeed, contrary to the "paleo" fad, grain consumption goes back to the days of Neandderthals; our gatherer-hunter ancestors gathered wild grains.) But traditional agricultural societies didn't see the sort of obesity crisis we see in industrial societies. Industrial societies are marked by high sugar consumption -- particularly in the past few decades -- which can led to general overeating, as everything becomes sweeter and more palatable. (Note how the title jumps right over the sugar to noodles.)
Industrial societies are also marked by sedentary lifestyles.
Overeating bad. Sugar bad, Meat bad, though the flesh of free-living wild animals is somewhat less bad than industrially-raised animals bred for generations to be fat. Dairy bad. Highly processed industrial food products bad. Grains ok if not over-processed; weight towards whole grains and heirloom varieties. Vegetables good. Legumes good.
And exercise good.
Then I'm sure you can cite some of this research? The actual fact is that in recent decades, firearms accidents and murders by firearm have both decreased while the number of guns in private hands has increased.
Now, if you don't like guns, that's fine; like abortions, if you don't like one, don't have one. But if you're going to talk about an "overwhelming amount of research" about crime, you'd better be able to cite some criminology papers.
your odds of surviving a knife attack are orders of magnitude better than surviving a shooting.
Not if the attacker has decided to kill you, no. Knife attacks are sometimes done specifically to wound or mutilate rather than kill.
The fact that despite the easy availability of black-market firearms 30% of US murders are committed without a firearm ought to clue you in that it's not "orders of magnitude" easier to survive an attack by other means.
The ancient world killed people with blades quite effectively. The armies of Alexander didn't have guns. Nor did the Romans, the folks who gave us the word "decimate".
But the phrase "Guns don't kill people" is verifiable bullshit.
No, assigning intent to inanimate objects is verifiable bullshit. Hammers don't build buildings. Scalpels don't perform surgeries. Guitars don't play music. Gasoline cans and matches don't burn down buildings. Shoes don't kick people. In all of those situations we understand that it is a person, not an object, which is responsible. But many people have an irrational emotional response to firearms due to their status as a cultural shibboleth, and so lose track of this principle.
A gun is a weapon, and has a single purpose. It kills. It kills well.
A gun is a tool, which fires small pellets at a high velocity. Pellets can be fired at a variety of targets for a variety of reasons. Among those reasons are both self-defense and aggressive violence against other human beings. They are neither the easiest not most efficient way to murder human beings, efficient mass murderers use fire while poison is easier for killing one at a time. Your local Home Depot is more dangerous than your local gun store. Firearms are, however, the best means of self- and community-defense yet developed. As the cliche says, God made man, but Samuel Colt made man equal.
The U.S.'s murder rate is linked much more to its prevalence of economic injustice and history of racism than to the legal status of firearms. (There is no correlation between a state's murder rate and it's gun laws, but there is one between it GINI score and its murder rate.) Criminologists are pretty clear that gun control laws have little effect on violent crime, and may increase it by decreasing the ability to citizens to defend themselves.
Fact - people are lazy animals, and if you put obstacles in front of them, the vast majority of them look for the path of least resistance, even if it yields an inferior result.
Yes. And that's why people "pirate": the copyright cartels have made it so inconvenient to get usable content that even if you throw a bunch of caltrops in the road to TPB, it's still better than a DVD with unskippable warnings and ads, or stuttering streaming video.
A global nuclear exchange ends civilization as we know it in minutes while climatic changes are something that we can adapt to
Climate change makes wars and conflicts more likely. (That's a Pentagon assessment.) More wars make escalation into a nuclear exchange more likely.
I do love how the denialist positions has evolved from "There is no warming!" to "Ok, there's warming, but it's not human caused!" to "Ok, there's warming and we're causing it, but we'll just adapt!"
Certain controls cannot be easily understood (like on/off states for check boxes or elements like tabs)
Thank you, I thought I was the only one. I have apps on my phone where I cannot tell if those on-off toggles are meant to indicate it's on or off. Use checkboxes, damn it.
My only fear: letting people get controlled by the advertisers and the government, each of whom are power hungry and relentless.
That's the real problem. Today, a computer user with any sophistication spends a great deal of time fighting their device and operating system to make it be the owner's servant rather than a spy and advertising delivery device. Rather than coding apps for my phone, I spent a lot of time this week finding hacks to fake location services for an intrusive app I wanted to use. (Just fake GPS doesn't do it anymore when apps use Google Play services and check your location via networks. The answer, BTW, turned out to be an Xposed module.)
"You can't make a program without broken egos."