Comment Re:Censorship (Score 1) 20
This sounds like the paper was retracted because people disagree with its conclusions. I am not sure how that is different than any other censorship. There once was a theory that the solution would be to write a paper disputing the conclusions. Now we expect authorities to censor it so no one is "confused" by incorrect information.
That's not how I understand it. It's because their own data, their own evidence does not support their conclusions. This was the reason the paper was retracted. You don't want to publish papers that show how to do science the wrong way.