Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:TreeStyleTab on Firefox (Score 1) 195

And for those reading this that either don't know what TreeStyleTabs is or why it is useful ... Modern widescreens make vertical screen space a premium. Most web layouts, of course, are vertical as well. Meaning your content and tab UI at the top (or bottom) of the screen are competing for the same space. TreeStyleTabs, among other features, moves the tab bar to a vertical list on the side, in an area of the screen that probably isn't being used for anything in the first place, and allows you to view more content vertically on the screen at one time.

I probably would never have tried it without the great explanation of someone touting its benefits in an Arstechnica thread, so hopefully repaying that here in this thread for others.

And yes, to tack on a reply to another comment to this parent, it's nice that Vivaldi brings the same base-feature to a Blink-based core.

Comment Re:Mac os for pc's is needed (Score 1) 535

It kind of feels like you started out on one thought in the subject line, which would have been on-topic, but then you went a bit off-topic on a rant on Mac hardware (not that you're wrong). But I think your original point, as expressed in the subject line, is that Mac OS would be a good alternative to Windows if it was available for PCs.

So let me address that point ... Uh, no :-). Two reasons:

- First, one of the biggest reasons that OS X/Mac OS "just works" is because Apple is able to tightly control the hardware, and has limited choice in models as a result. The slow upgrade cycle and limited hardware options that you highlight as issues are the very same reasons why they are so successful in software. If Apple had to support as many different hardware types and configurations as Microsoft does with Windows, I strongly believe they would struggle to achieve anywhere near the same level of software quality.

- Second, and more debatable, the topic at hand is how Microsoft is locking down the OS more and taking away user options. But isn't Apple a much greater offender in this regard? OS X may have started out more open, but it seems to me that it has started to move more in the direction of iOS in recent years.

Comment Really, not that interesting .... (Score 5, Interesting) 68

Seriously, in other "news", Amazon sees a huge decline in revenue in Q1 every year ...

Yes, Comcast, and just about every other related company (cable, IPTV, or satellite), loses subs every year in Q2, or at best sees fewer gains. People tend to move out of their houses in the spring, so that they can sell during the peak buying summer season, since families with children prefer not to move during the school year. And college students cancel their subscriptions when school ends in May or June (Q2) for the summer (even broadband, if they are living off campus). Typically, they gain the majority (or perhaps more, some years) of those subs back in Q3 or Q4; as evidenced by the "flat" year-over-year numbers.

Yes, losing 4,000 subs in Q2 is something for Comcast to celebrate, because if history is any indication, that means that they are actually going to see positive growth for the year. But it's not all good news. It's entirely possible that history isn't an indication, and that the reason that fewer subs were lost in Q2 this year was because there are fewer students subscribing in the first place. And that means that these subs won't reappear in the fall, if that's the case. I can't tell for certain, but it's a possibility.

Comment Re:Preferable != ideal and wrong conclusions (Score 1) 314

A great analysis. Some points to add:

  • - I don't think that it's technically required that the attacker have physical access, but it's kind of a moot point otherwise. If the attacker can log in remotely anyway, then they already have access to the unencrypted data because Bitlocker has unlocked the drive at boot time based on the TPM or other protector, right? What full disk encryption does do is protect against those with physical access but not remote access. In other words, the same set of 1-3, and probably 4.
  • - Agreed on (5). I seem to remember seeing a quote from someone in security circles that said something like, "I typically assume that at least two countries have access to my system at any given point in time." In other words, you are already vulnerable; deal with it. Granted, this provides an additional attack vector, but as you said, it's the same for most corporations running Bitlocker with AD. The threat is no greater with MS storing the key, and probably much lower than your typical IT department.

Comment Re:Duh, that's how encryption works (Score 1) 314

Hmm. I don't see that you'd have any problem either. If you already encrypt with Bitlocker on Win 7 (Pro, Ultimate, or Enterprise, obviously), then MS would have no way of getting your recovery keys post de facto, right? You'd have to unencrypt the disk, then install Win 10, then let MS re-encrypt it for you.

Speaking of, I've installed Pro and Enterprise on several TPM machines, and Bitlocker has never automatically been enabled (unless through IT policies, in which case the recovery is backed up to corporate IT servers. In the case of Pro, it's always asked me if I want to store the recovery key with my Windows account, along with the other options of saving it to a file or printing it.

I tend to think that this is, for the most part, only going to impact Home users who don't know how to otherwise use Bitlocker. It looks to me like a "poor man's Bitlocker" for Home users who didn't have the option before. In other words, Group B is going to be substantially better off, and Group A will be in the same position as they are now, because they'll be manually configuring Bitlocker on Pro or higher.

Comment Re:Craziness (Score 2) 314

This.

If Microsoft was forcing full-disk encryption on Windows 10 Home users (and I'm not convinced that they are), then it's still better than the alternative of having no encryption, right? Someone might argue that it's a "false sense of security" since you really don't know where the recovery keys could have gone, but I seriously doubt that most of these users would even know that they had encryption on anyway, so it can't be a false sense of security if you never knew you had the security in the first place.

And I'm not convinced this is even that widespread. I've installed Win 10 Pro on several machines with the TPM chip enabled from a previous install, and none of them automatically encrypted. In each case, I had to manually turn on Bitlocker. I can't speak for Home installs, but having this "poor man's Bitlocker" seems an upgrade over the "no encryption at all" (or third-party) in 8.1 Home and before. And seriously, how many Home users have actually configured their TPM in the first place?

Speaking as the "family tech support" guy, I'm happy that Microsoft went this route (again, if they did). It ensures that recovery is possible in case of the need to switch the drive to a new machine, without making me have to explain to each of my family members what to do during each install. And really, my advice for these users would be to let Microsoft manage it anyway. I wouldn't trust that they would print out a recovery key and put it in their safe (don't forget labeling it properly to make sure they knew which computer/drive it went with), purchase some storage media (e.g. flash drive) to keep in the safe, or safely store it in some other way. For these HOME users, having the recovery key in their MS account is "good enough", especially when they probably wouldn't have encryption otherwise.

Side note: The fact that there are around 100 replies after the nonsensical question "Can a corporate security officer comment?" goes to show why Slashdot should put back in the "most recent posts first" sort order and have it as the default. This just isn't an issue for corporate use, since they are going to manage Bitlocker recovery keys themselves in AD. And yet then you get a dozen nonsensical replies that, "This is why no company would consider Windows 10."

Why center the discussion around the person who put all of 10 seconds of thought into their "First post" when the better thought out posts will be further down?

Comment Re:Agile. (Score 5, Insightful) 507

Well no wonder - 40 devs is way too large for a single scrum team. And both of those meetings should take place at the team level, not for everyone working on the product. Why not split into 4-5 smaller scrum teams and let the SMs and POs coordinate any inter-dependencies?

Comment Re:Private school (Score 1) 690

Boys appear to be failing behind girls in both public and private schools. It's good to hear that you are willing to sacrifice to ensure your child receives a quality education, but I caution against simply assuming that private schools don't have many of the same issues. While I'd agree, on the whole, that many private schools outclass their public equivalents, private schools often have their own set of issues.

I recommend a book that I just started reading myself, "Why Boys Fail: Saving Our Sons from an Educational System That's Leaving Them Behind", by Roger Whitmire. While I'm only two chapters in, it's already clear that he's done a lot of research in this area. Being armed with some real data behind this issue can help you choose a private school that understands how to educate both boys and girls.

Television

Submission + - 10 years ago today - The original Firefly premier post on Slashdot (slashdot.org)

brix writes: I still remember learning about the premier of Firefly from this Slashdot post, 10 years ago today. It's an interesting read, in retrospect.

It's hard to believe now that the Slashdot audience would have had anything but praise for the show, but the reality was much different. Within a few hours of the premier, it was clear that the initial Slashdot reaction was fairly negative. Some posters hated Firefly before it even aired (and especially after), simply because it replaced Dark Angel on the schedule.

Fox clearly misfired by holding back Whedon's original pilot, but I've always felt that the initial Slashdot reaction, fair or not, was the true indication that Firefly would be cancelled so tragically early.

Security

Submission + - Apple's Secret Plan to Join iPhones with Airport Security

Hugh Pickens writes writes: "Currently — as most of us know — TSA agents briefly examine government ID and boarding passes as each passenger presents their documents at a checkpoint at the end of a security line but Thom Patterson writes at CNN that under a 2008 Apple patent application that was approved in July and filed under the working title "iTravel," a traveler's phone would automatically send electronic identification to a TSA agent as soon as the traveler got in line and as each traveler waits in line, TSA agents would examine the electronic ID at an electronic viewing station. Next, at the X-ray stations, a traveler's phone would confirm to security agents that the traveler's ID had already been checked. Apple's patent calls for the placement of special kiosks (PDF) around the airport which will automatically exchange data with your phone via a close range wireless technology called near field communication (NFC). Throughout the process, the phone photo could be displayed on a screen for comparison with the traveler. Facial recognition software could be included in the process. Several experts say a key question that must be answered is: How would you prove that the phone is yours? To get around this problem, future phones or electronic ID may require some form of biometric security function including photo, fingerprint and photo retinal scan comparisons. Of course, there is still a ways to go. If consumers, airlines, airports and the TSA don't embrace the NFC kiosks, experts say it's unlikely Apple's vision would become reality. "First you would have to sell industry on Apple's idea. Then you'd have to sell it to travel consumers," says Neil Hughes of Apple Insider. "It's a chicken-and-egg problem.""

Comment Re:Lame 3D tech is a once per generation fad. (Score 1) 261

Not trying to raise the whole "passive vs. active" debate here (although it's fine if it arises), but your comment really surprised me since passive 3D glasses do seem to be standardized, are typically lightweight and comfortable, and even come in clip-ons for those with existing glasses.

On the topic in general -- While I usually won't spend extra $$ to see 3D in the theatre, that's because I'd rather wait for the blu-ray reviews and grab the 3D version then.

Comment Re:YAY the cracked the passwords (Score 2) 198

Who is "they"? The public at large has access to the password file but not the account names. However, there's really no telling what the original hacker has. For security purposes, we assume the worst, and that is that someone has both the account names and a password file for which almost a third of the passwords have proven easily cracked.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Consider a spherical bear, in simple harmonic motion..." -- Professor in the UCB physics department

Working...