Comment Re:17 Years! (Score 1) 22
> it still doesn't seem like a meaningful improvement over KDE 3.5.
Have you tried LXQt?
On Debian just install it and uninstall connman and it's pretty good for most tasks, especially low-spec devices.
> it still doesn't seem like a meaningful improvement over KDE 3.5.
Have you tried LXQt?
On Debian just install it and uninstall connman and it's pretty good for most tasks, especially low-spec devices.
Some neural nets have been good at solving sticky programming problems. Whether finding game cheats, doing voice recognition, modeling proteins, or other tasks humans haven't done well at.
But an LLM is more of an information retrieval tool, so tasking it with clever algorithm design is asking the wrong tool the wrong question.
Then there are the people who complete in programming challenges. In high school I would sometimes stay after to do the ACSL competition tests - no big deal, the school was a five minute walk, and it helped my buddies who wanted a high team score.
Then they implored me to go to DC on a trip for a national competition our score qualified us for. This seemed so bizzare to me as a fifteen year old kid - I could stay in a run-down motel and take tests this weekend or go camping in a state forest with friends. I let them down, in a way, but the ask was totally alien to me.
I have nothing at all against people who enjoy such things but it's a subset of the algorithm minds.
So we now have the results of some competitive coders vs. the wrong tool for the job.
OK, mildly interesting, but does it tell us much?
Are any of the profits going to Gila Monster conservation?
So every international traveler could be searched to see if their meds contain any patent violations and seized at the border?
This is entirely unworkable.
Didn't they say some rogue VP set up his laptop to torrent all 72TB of Z-Library to feel o-llama?
I wish my laptop had that many drive bays!
Some people so want to believe that a useful information retrieval system is a superintelligence.
The rest of us aren't surprised that an interesting search engine isn't good at chess.
I'm familiar with some organizations that have been feeding their Slack data into a RAG for employee queries.
They're going to be quite pissed if this has been shut down by Slack.
So the system responded that it was an already claimed serial number and not an invalid serial number? Who the fuck would do that?
Let's say someone put in a claim.
Well what is to stop them from trying consecutive serial numbers to see if they can get even more?
I implemented portsentry feeding fail2ban on edge servers to deal with the unrelenting scans.
It helps, somewhat.
Yup, but now the AI lobby is stronger than the oil lobby.
I guess whichever the military needs more.
There are some videos online with sound.
Do we hear the engines?
Hopefully an airplane enthusiast who is familiar with the expected sound profile can comment.
Yes great to mention the linking aspect, that was key to the whole thing being really useful.
That is the question.
I can see if they outsourced something and delegated a subdomain and the contract expired and then somehow the spammers got the IP's (hosting farm?) which had been abandoned and set up DNS.
But I've never been able to request a specific IP when setting up a VPS or colo, so it's kinda a mystery to me.
404 should have included the most basic of details.
Our social structures prey on the human animal instinct for convenience and instant gratification.
Higher-level humans are trained to resist these urges by traditional social structures.
The "cultural Marxists" encourage each of the "seven deadly sins" to disarm the people who are being trained in the more frontal-lobe strategies. That makes them much easier to control.
Big Tech is an instrument of this structure. Corporate law makes it trivial to exploit them, and that's the ones not founded by Int-Q-Tel.
Without news sites to scrape, there will be no feeding the AI. With one key exception. When a site is driven by political agenda instead of advertisement revenue.
You have it partially right here.
But the one divergence from the pattern you didn't list is, that because most AI. (and Google's AI specifically) is very left leaning, it will feed you only left leaning news... so the sites that will remain, and keep earring revenue are more right leaning sites since people would have to go to them directly anyway to seek out news Google will never give them.
Of course that merely delays the full effect of what you lay out, when most for-profit left wing news sites fold the AI starved for information will in the end actually make use of right leaning sites as well.
What it does mean is that left wing news sites that remain in the next year or so will only be hyper-partisan info funded by some external source.
The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that, you've got it made. -- Jean Giraudoux