Which can be expensive if you download the app over USB or Wi-Fi at home but then first-run it while on 3G, and it spends a sizable percent of your monthly transfer allowance downloading the resources.

I just go to OptusZoo and it's there.

Distinct in the sense of being orthogonal. It is possible to believe there is no god while admitting that you do not know that there is no god. Knowledge is the intersection of truth and belief, and since the truth value of the god hypothesis can never be conclusively determined, the most we can ever achieve is a strong suspicion. Atheists, by and large, are agnostics. But people who call themselves agnostics are different from atheists, in my experience, in their willingness to entertain the possibility rather than reject it. I agree with the earlier poster who thought this was an odd notion, because there is an uncountably infinite number of unfalsifiable propositions to entertain. What makes the god hypothesis worthy of this special consideration, when we casually reject all the others?

Incidentally, dictionary.com defines disbelief as "the inability or refusal to believe or to accept something as true" which strikes me more as not believing there is a god than believing there is no god. So, by your definition, you're an atheist if you believe there is no god OR if you merely refuse to believe there is one.

Formula screwed up on submission:

B*C < E*F then you don't do it. This assumes that the damage/loss properly values human life, if that's part of the risk - in the millions per life.

No. The problem with mars is that it lacks the gravity to keep gaseous particles bound to it's atmosphere, such that the solar wind removes a really small % of it's atmosphere annually.

Technically, a plane is easier to "drive" than a car. You don't have to worry about gears, mirrors, brake, clutch, indicators etc....

The difficulty with a plane is the "piloting" part. All the protocols that need to be followed (particularly before and during take off and during and after landing)

Oh my, the times are changing too fast for me, it seems. I can easily carry in my bag at least one piece of hardware for reading text. In the form of analogue book.

And I've heard those e-book readers are actually smaller. And can hold much more than one volume.

"But the fact that the algorithm runs is the best proof of it working"

Eh?

I, and all other programmers, have written plenty algorithms that run. That does not mean it works correctly according to the initial spec.