Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment link resource allocation to community size (Score 1) 45

from the article:

"It seems like many ‘vibe coders’ don't realize that they don't actually have a community around them. They build projects as if they had, and spend resources accordingly. We see projects having a lot of code activity, heavy CI/CD testing, frequent and large release binaries. Sometimes, it feels like the amount of supported platforms exceeds the amount of actual users.

To us, it seems ridiculous to see projects with a single developer and virtually no users consuming as much or even more resources than some of the largest community projects on Codeberg, which operate frugal with CI/CD and storage resources. We do not believe it is reasonable for Codeberg to invest our precious donation money into hosting of large ghost projects."

They go on about increased hardware costs because of the AI hype

Maybe this could better be fixed with a "community size" metric and assigning resources accordingly. The more stars, downloads, contributers, PR's the more resources.

Comment Re: happy (Score 3, Informative) 49

As a Belgian, I am not that happy about the idea of re-nationalizing TGEM with Engie.
The nuclear provisions fund (via Synatom) was supposed to cover decommissioning and waste. It was built up during decades when the plants were still public and nit profitable. But a big part of that money was lent back to Electrabel, which then could generate profits on it and pay dividends to Engie shareholders.
So profits where privatized, and now the longterm risks become public again. Restarting these plants will take additional billions in public money. And it is only needed during wintertime, in the summerthere is overcapacity because of renewables. So the nuclear sites will never be profitable again, and less and less so.

Slashdot Top Deals

Prediction is very difficult, especially of the future. - Niels Bohr

Working...