Comment Re:Would be a crack up (Score 1) 151
Given the reference list, I suspect not ChatGPT, but rather https://magisterium.com/
Given the reference list, I suspect not ChatGPT, but rather https://magisterium.com/
Absolutely. Many years ago I did real, actual. science and the amount of computer-based modelling that we t on was insane - it could only have become more prevalent in the decades since. Nothing wrong with that - it's just another tool. But if someone has already decided that all scientists are wrong, then no amount of reason or experience is going to overturn their cultish belief.
I've been looking since March 2024. Having no reasonable options in sight, have reopened https://informationr.us/
In this job search, Linked In and Dice- but MOST of my LinkedIn devolves down into one of the above quickly. The number of scammers on Linked In is truly awesome.
Interesting, GRC (Steve Gibson, IIRC) used to have something like that for Windows way back when.
It was nice to be able to keep tabs on what apps were doing, but of course, it was a different era, one where you ran "programs" and they were mostly self-contained and offline.
Nowadays you run a stripped-down web browser and everything you do is backed by some remote API or another.
Is it just me or are these three platforms the arena of bad decision making in startup businesses? When somebody tries to lure me off of social media into one of these three platforms, alarm bells start ringing in my mind. If you're leading your business with communications on Signal or Whatsapp, just know that I for one will not be taking your business seriously.
I was actually in college in the 1990s, but yes, a middle schooler today with python on a raspberry pi and a pretty simple GPS module could do this.
I didn't say it wasn't abhorrent or alarming. I'm presenting the scenario that this task of "defend this three dimensional coordinate box" doesn't require AI.
Yes, it did. The beacon signals weren't that good back then, neither were the sensors. I had the same problem in the fake robot battles I was involved in.
The answer turned out to be a solution not from Defense industries, but from Genie Garage Door Openers.
The robot doesn't care. The robot's job isn't foreign policy. The robot's job is "here's a box defined by this coordinate cloud, defend it"
Like I said, I programmed it for a fighting robot back in the 1990s. It ain't that complex, and with today's drone factory ships, the Navy can now output this level of AI in killbots at a rate of 10,000 a day.
Kill decisions are simple in comparison: Stay within your predefined geofence, kill anything that moves that isn't transmitting Friend beacon. We don't need AI for that, I coded a form of it in both Basic and Forth back in the 1990s.
And if they don't, some other startup will.
Or time literacy. Permanent!=3 years
Don't be so sure that Republicans aren't Communists and Democrats aren't Fascists.
The Tao doesn't take sides; it gives birth to both wins and losses. The Guru doesn't take sides; she welcomes both hackers and lusers.