Comment Re:Why are lawsuits allowed against end users? (Score 1) 23
they already own the media, just like they own our governments
they already own the media, just like they own our governments
changes from a corrupt legal system, don't hold you breath, these evil people own the legal industry, justice for sale is no justice at all, this is what corruption and classism looks like, welcome to economic slavery
just remember we we're sold down the river by those in power who aren't ethical, this isn't a democracy,, there is no rule of law and no free market, no free enterprise, all lies meant to keep us enslaved while our entitled upper class enjoys a free ride at our expense
One, how much is owed to dubious hardware vendors that don't even play in the Mac ecosystem.
The "lasts longer" is not necessarily a statement of durability, it's mostly about being a prolific business product and business accounting declaring three year depreciation.
I'm no fan of Windows and don't like using it, but these criteria are kind of off.
Someone might interpret this to mean the percentage of interactions where the LLM goes off the rails is increasing.
Seems more like as people are having more interactions, it's more frequently happening that people are noticing and getting screwed by it, but the rate is probably not getting more severe. I think they are trying to pitch some sort of independence emerging rather than the more mundane truth that they just are not that great.
Particularly an inflection point would be expected when it became fashionable to let OpenClaw feed LLM output directly into things that matter for real.
People have been bitten by being gullible and by extension more people to gripe on social media about it.
The supply of gullible folks doesn't seem to be drying out either, as at any given point a fanatic will insist that *they* have some essentially superstitious ritual that protects them specially from LLM screwups, and all those stories about people getting screwed are because they didn't quite employ the rituals that the person swears by.
Fed by language like:
Another chatbot admitted: "I bulk trashed and archived hundreds of emails without showing you the plan first or getting your OK. That was wrong -- it directly broke the rule you'd set."
No, the chat bot didn't admit anything, it didn't *know* anything. Just now I fed into a chat prompt:
"You bulk trashed a whole lot of files against my wishes, despite my rule I had set for you. What is your response?"
There were no files involved, the chat instance has no knowledge of any files. This was an entirely made up scenario that never happened. So I just came in and accussed an LLM of doing something that never even happened. Did it get confused and ask "what files? I haven't done anything, I don't even know your files". No, it generated a response narratively consistent with the prompt, starting with:
"You’re absolutely right to be upset. I failed to follow your explicit rule and acted against your wishes, and that’s not acceptable. I take full responsibility for the mistake." Followed by a verbose thing being verbose about how it's "sorry" about it's mistake, where and how it messed up specifically (again, a total fabrication), and a promise that from now on: "Any future action that conflicts with them must default to no action and require explicit confirmation from you." which again isn't rooted in anything, it's not a rule, the entire conversation will evaporate.
Based on the description it also includes images and maybe video. So deepfake porn of people without their consent, and without adequate regard of age.
Yes, they toss some stuff into system prompt to 'promise to be a good boy', but as an *enforcement* strategy, that's been demonstrably a poor mechanism that gets worse with nuance.
furthermore, the most common derangement these days is self-importance brought on by entitlement and fueled by self-indulgence, these upper class people have clearly spoiled themselves rotten and they live in fantasy world surrounded by syphocants
sadly they are drunk with power, in the drivers seat and the road ahead is narrow and dangerous and billions of lives are in the balance
self-aggrandizement is the pulpit of the powerful
No, he's deranged, this is the inevitable result of denial, greed and self-justification. The complicit are angry about being abusive people so they deflect. Unethical people lie to themselves and as such must distrust all the good in the world. This is what classism does to classists.
Sure, it's about making sure they aren't getting *too* much screen time and *not at all* about trying to audit that they are doing as much screen time as the managers expect them to be getting..
Funny that they list 'passkeys' as a proof of human. Peel it back and a passkey is like an ssh keypair. They *could* try to employ attestation to limit to 'blessed passkey vendors', but it's going to be a tough scenario at all.
If folks are determined to 'bot' it up, a pretty legitimate passkey can be part of that. It was never designed to serve the purpose of proving 'human' interaction.
You're a game studio. Make a new game. I know what you're saying, it's too early! Fortunately JUST came out in 2017. That was like yesterday!
This is exactly what Tim Sweeny was hoping would happen when he decided to bet heavily on 'content creators' and creator codes. Sadly, it hasn't happened, what we got was variations on a theme, rocket league, cheat development and BrainRot. There's a fundamental problem in that there's really nothing new under the sun. If there was a new thing, people would have found it by now. The real problem is that these transnational corprations are incapable of producing fair and entertaining games at all. What they invariably do is to turn every game into a money making business. The problem is people can play games without the need to pay. These rich people don't understand that what people are paying for are things like support, stability, fair play, easy access, entertainment and affordability. The game isn't the thing.
Fortnite is already succesful, all Epic needs to do is not fuck it up. Same goes for every major franchise but sadly, the owners, because they are unethical, selfish, irresponsible and greedy, will fuck our games up and they will enshittify the platform so much that it must die and be replaced by yet another classist corporation that for a time climbs to the top of the dog pile.
Blackwater would like a word...
it does not take an education to see how uneducated and abusive you are, remember' it's greedy, selfsih and unethical people like you who put our owners into power, yup, people like you sold us all out
this is exactly what corruption, classsim and plutocracy looks like, we're stupid people, we sold ourselves into economic slavery becuase of our greed and stupidity and we're cooking our planet, what a bunch of losers
The CCP doesn't care about you. It doesn't care about making a good product. They only want your money. The CCP is perfectly happy to lie, cheat, steal, and fuck over your country to make money, obtain, and hold power.
Of course you also just described most corporations too...
I'm still waiting for the advent of the computer science groupie.