It was male. However, it was also gay, as Colbert will reveal.

Gay elves, gay hobbits. You'll see.

There will be female elves beating up everything: orcs, male elves, male humans, dragons, horses, barrels of ale. Everything.

Also, girl Legolas. Bet that.

Might have made a good date movie, if anyone still went on dates.

Imagine thinking gamers still matter to Huang.

I mean what I said. We've had decades of obfuscation, lies and demurring bullshit on domestic surveillance by FBI and others. Now, the FBI director has committed a little candor and confirmed what we all know. This takes away a fig leaf that surveillance apologist's hide behind.

I'm sure this is frustrating for you: crediting an appointee of the big orange Nazi and all... but there you go. Guess you'll just have to tough it out.

It's more candor than we've ever gotten from any FBI director, ever.

I realize AAA game designers will adapt and use new capabilities to produce better "atmosphere," just as they always have. Shit tier games will still be shit, but different. Ultimately, nothing of value will be lost.

I don't care about this much, but I took a quick look.

The DLSS 5 face looks about a decade better than the non-DLSS face. The latter is how faces have appeared for decades in games: not quite there. The former is far better: the eyes look real. Skin tone is convincing. Nice.

The alley/street/whatever is dramatically different. Not necessarily better or worse, but very different. So that's a thing that will bother people that are all wrapped around the axle about "atmosphere."

Overall I prefer the DLSS 5 version pretty strongly. It looks better.

There. A former gamer that likes it. Hate on, you spoiled brats.

Wider temperature range is a killer feature. It simplifies everything, so the plant costs far less and needs much less attention.

LOL.

Prophetic much?

When this one pops, it's going to be biblical.

Well, now you know all this is going to end badly.

AT&T is a $125b/y legacy outfit. They're going to leverage 2x their annual revenue in 5 years on spec...

Yeah. Good luck with that.

Only in the minds of limousine commies that think the US has succumb to the 4th Reich.

Meanwhile, Pavel Durov gets nabbed in France. Graham Linehan gets nabbed in Heathrow by establishment jackboots. Yet in the minds of the special people that jet around the world to attend parody award events, the US is "dangerous."

mmkay.

Given what they've been doing, one is forced to stop and think for a moment whether or not that's a typo. It is a typo, but yeah, still makes you think.

Someone needs a bit more coffee.

There is you and your claims. And then there is Mozilla, with '14 of which were considered "high severity..."'.

So who to believe? You, in the peanut gallery, or Mozilla, using Anthropic's best models and documenting their results?

I know who I'm going with.

Also, what is the point of Rust now? LLMs run down defects at low cost. Do we need new languages that attempt to prevent defects by design? Perhaps we're better off with simpler languages, and simpler compilers that are fast and portable. We may get to the point where LLMs can efficiently create proofs for C, similar to what humans did for seL4, and obviate the need for underspecified, moving targets like Rust and its supposed benefits.

Intel sold its XMM modem chipset business to Apple. It did not exit the wireless market. As you can see here, (from 2023, four years after the Apple sale,) Intel has been and continues developing new products for wireless operators, and is now, with this new Xeon, on its third generation of such devices. Overall, Intel exited the low margin, highly competitive "client" end of the wireless world and focused on the high margin wireless network operator end, where their VLSI capabilities face less competition.

Your take on Intel wireless is the result of consuming headlines without understanding. Your take on Xeon being exclusive to workstations, servers and supercomputers is similarly naïve. OEMs build proprietary systems based on Xeons such as this new 18A device and embed them in network core facilities that are not "datacenters." I wrote "essentially embedded" because, while the term "embedded" is not used to describe these deployments, that is essentially what they are: dedicated silicon deployed in proprietary systems that are not general purpose datacenters. They will not be running arbitrary VMs or other "public cloud" workloads, but instead vertically integrated software stacks proprietary to a wireless operator's business.

Please, in the future, consider your own ignorance before commenting: there is more going on in the world than what you're shown on Ars Technica and YouTube.