It very much depends on what is classified as advanced there. It's more than capable of throwing together an obvious AI front end. It's reasonably good for adding the right permissions. It still completely falls apart for anything remotely out of the normal click button call api load new page and show data. For example I was mucking around with esp32 and android BLE. Something that is very well documented on all three sides, certainly not an advanced feature yet it took hours of debugging something that I can manually write in under 5 minutes. I will give it credit it did suggest using a feature I hadn't even heard of that got around a problem. However that problem didn't exist when coded by hand. Despite software developers raving over it online I'm still yet to find it that capable outside of a search engine. It's hundreds of times better at UI than I am but that's a looow bar!
Thanks for your reply. That's kinda what I was experiencing. Basic stuff worked, AI write code to access HealthKit and load into the app some medical data. However, once it got to parsing the data for use it was a complete failure inclusive of a doom loop of tries. Exhausting.
Why can't we be allowed to keep nice things? I've been using bitwarden for years now, and I will never use anything else (other than a similar 3rd party password manager) again. Yes, there are plenty of competitors with similar features, but bitwarden is consistently top-ranked by actual security experts, and the interface is great, especially now that it can do passkeys. But that ranking comes 100% from *transparency*. The instant that goes away, nobody sane is going to keep them around.
"Always free" is nice, but not a deal-breaker. I only have free now because I don't really need anything at the premium level. I refuse to pay subscriptions for things that I should be able to buy once, but they do provide an actual service (keyring syncing), so I will grumble, but it's a valid reason.
I don't need any of the "premium features" either but I pay for premium. More folks should do this when someone is asking a very reasonable price for a wel run and made service. Please support the developer and pay the measly $19.80 a year for premium. Perhaps, this will prevent "enshitification"
by simply existing.
I mean... at least it's not Slack or Zoom. The competitors had a chance to do better and didn't.
In 2022/2021Teams rapidly became popular with businesses once MS bundled it for free with 365 subscriptions despite users hating it. At the time it was a horrible application that was buggy, low quality conferencing, and had multiple versions that didn't interoperate (i.e Teams business and Teams personal different apps).
I remember quite clearly business users all complaining ("Ugh, Teams sucks") but they had no choice once their IT department got deals for Office with teams and then dumped their Zoom, WebEx, etc services despite them both being a lot better..
by 2000 you get a teac that would do 15-25k metal tape and 80+ and 60db of dynamic range with almost zero noise. If you wen hi fi VHS you get et 100db and 80db of range and almost 50db channel seperation with zero noise since the singles was FM encoded on the tape with a carrier wave around 10mhz
By 2000, no one into live concert recording would touch analog cassettes tapes; everyone in the scene by 2000 all used DAT and some were moving to hard disk/solid state recording. The only folks using cassette by as last as the mid-90s didn't know what there were doing or were extremely poor (portable DATs could be had for $400).
"You show me an American who can keep his mouth shut and I'll eat him." -- Newspaperman from Frank Capra's _Meet_John_Doe_
