Conservation of energy? Duh? The *only* source of energy you have is solar irradiation (no, chips do not magically make their own energy), and you dissipate it passively as radiation as well. The only "problem" is distributing your heat away from hotspots like chips so they don't fry, like running a coolant loop through the entire thing, but otherwise your space station has exactly the energy balance of a rock floating in space 1 AU away from the Sun. What's the average temp of the Moon? Oh, it's minus fifty C.

Ah yes, those "cheap and getting cheaper every minute!!!!11" batteries that leftist propaganda is chock full of, but which are conspicuously absent at any dealership selling home energy stores.

Define "General Intelligence". As in an operational definition, i.e, a something like Turing test, that allows you to differentiate between AI and human. Oh, by the way, "human" also includes 5 year olds, ans your test must classify them as having "General Intelligence". Well?

Ah, nevermind, I see that your vision of "General Intelligence" is "follows the same politics as I do". Forget I asked anything.

Accidental, lol. Believe me, there's nothing "accidental" about this, they only act that way when called out.

I suppose you do whatever it is you do, purely for betterment of humanity and expect no wages paid in return? No? So why should the pharma industry be any different? And before you spew some variant of "but but but those profits are unreasonably high!", no they are not, just look at performance of pharma companies on the stock market. Pretty average returns, in line with other industries.

LOL, how nicely brainwashed you are. In actual, you know, real reality, having to "sell" off their energy at negative prices is something that happens much more frequently to renewables-rich places like Germany or (suprisingly) Texas. Guess what, this "demand" is fairly easy to predict, despite your scaremongering, humans tend to follow predictable patterns in their behaviour, while weather does whatever the fuck it wants.

Believe me, you're better off being awaken from the "we can just base our economy off printing green paper" dream by Trump today, than by Chinese in 15 years. And guess what, adjusting to reality sucks, compared to dreaming the dream for a bit more.

Yes, what a brilliant idea, to enter the troubled times ahead with economy that can only produce green printed paper, and let our geopolitical opponents monopolise the production of *actually* valuable products like steel, oil, cars and electronics.

Oh, right I know, were it not for evil Trump the Chinese would have just kept trading them for green paper indefinitely, because, ummm, because they're good guys, enjoy doing slave labour for us, besides green paper is magic, and no matter how much we print everyone will be just *desperate* for more!

After 300 years said waste is comparable in radioactivity to natural uranium ore. All those gazillion years numbers come from greenies who demand to have it stored until it is completely inert, which is of course a completely unreasonable standard, rather than 100 years it'd take to wait until it's safe enough to be just mixed into concrete, buried and forgotten about.

One, so far the EU did their censorship by threatening legal action against people hosting content if they don't remove it, and they don't actually have the technical means to filter network traffic at such a scale, and it will take non-trivial amount of money and effort to implement this, not to mention wrangling with nation-states to force it.

Two, the official launch of The Great Firewall of Europe might open some eyes to how Orwellian the EU has become.

Quit projecting what you think on others, actual hard data unequivocally points that it's mostly just you leftists who daydream of being able to shoot your political opponents. 25% of "very liberal" people disagree with the statement "political violence is never justified" as opposed to just 3% of "very conservative" people.

Yes we know. Metaphors such as this are a perfectly normal part of language, used by normal humans. And no, getting your panties in a twist over them doesn't make you look smart, it just makes you look on the spectrum.

No, it's quite simple. It all comes down to the neoKeynesian economics that runs rampant. Print all the money you want, the increased spending will stimulate the economy! Wooohooo! Except noone thinks what happens to that deluge of money AFTER it spins through economy once or twice. Well let me tell you: it ends up with someone who does not live a hand to mouth lifestyle and who will be looking to invest it, i.e. take it to the stock market. And when you flood the stock market with newly printed money you basically create bubbles, I mean it HAS to go somewhere, are you going to just sit on cash and watch it get debased by the Fed? No, so you invest it, and the more cash flows in the more stupid (out of desperation) the investments become. Make no mistake, were it not AI, we'd be seeing bubble on something else, be it VR, latest GLP-1 agonist or space company. The valuation of US stock market more than doubled over last 10 years, did the actual value of produced goods double in that time too?

LOL, you really have no clue, do you :DDDD decision tree writing a working compiler, sure :DDDDDDD I wonder why none of AI researchers ever demonstrated anything like that, a decision tree writing a working C compiler, I mean it'd easily be a Nature paper :DDDDD But of course I bet YOU could easily do that over weekend if you just put your mind to it, you just have more important things on you, right? :DDDDDDDD

Even if all that did was "just transpile GCC code it was trained on into Rust" its hugely impressive, I mean just look at actual existing cutting edge transpilers, and the code they produce. Hint: they suck, and the code they make is usually unreadable even if it works.

The "let's rewrite everything into Rust for the hell of it" crowd I bet is already eyeing this thing. uutils people are doing exactly this scenario.

Also, how quick those goalposts move, eh? Seems only last year you were like "LLMs SUUUUUCK, they can't even figure out simple 10 line coding assignments reliably" today it's "LLMs SUUUUUUUCK a compiler they wrote from scratch generates less efficient code than a decades old project", wonder what your next year's goalposts will be?

Please remind me: what was the original timeline on James Webb Space Telescope when NASA first announced it, and when was it *actually* put in space? Were you as frothy at the mouth about it as you are now?