Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:this will last until the democrats return (Score -1) 195

Guy in a buffalo suit is pretty a pretty mild description of people attempting to break into secure rooms where elected officials were cowering. Or are you one of those morons who claim Ashley Babbit was peaceful.

What part of "partially violent protest" was too hard for you to understand?

Of people breaking into Senator's offices and stealing "mementos".

What part of "partially violent protest" was too hard for you to understand?

Or you know, building a gallows and chanting "Hang Mike Pence".

What part of "partially violent protest" was too hard for you to understand?

Comment Re:this will last until the democrats return (Score -1) 195

It is amazing to me how you can whine and cry from "government overstepping" where moderation was encouraged, only to turn around and rally for arresting public officials over protesting. Did you not see what happened January 6th, 2021, where individuals LITERALLY stormed a building calling for violence? The self awareness with you people is astounding.

Yes, we saw, there's even a word for it: "riot". Or protest partially turned violent (because, you know, 99% of people who were there remained peaceful). And please piss off with your conspiracy theories over how that guy in a buffalo suit was supposedly an actual threat to the statehood of most powerful democracy on the planet.

Comment Re:why not (Score -1) 79

Why not just get the data from a satellite broker?

Because that'd be just as illegal. People have expectation of privacy on their private property, as long as they take reasonable measures to protect it (which include building a fence, but categorically DO NOT include building a military-grade anti-sat camouflage canopy over your backyard). And the technical means the f-ing government uses to sidestep that, whether drones, sats or police raids is totally irrelevant to the legality of it. So is the ease and availability of those means. So yes, if you're a government drone, you get a f-ing warrant before you even open Google Maps satellite view to peep on someone's private property. At least that's how it *should* work if the libs in California didn't think the 4th Amendment should apply only when the Republicans are in power.

Comment Re:Collecting data on you (Score -1) 52

Most of this will turn out not to be "defense", but "national security".

Known as the "counter-espionage", "internal intelligence" or political police in the former Communist countries.

The KGB, Stasi, Belügyminisztérium III and the Securitate pale in comparison to the plans of the "swamp drainers" for surveillance.

Makes "governing" really easy for the people in power.

Quite funny to hear that all of a sudden from people who were all "if you've done nothing wrong you have nothing to fear" while their guy was in power.

Comment Re:What kind of idiocy is this? (Score -1) 255

This rule seems to be trying to discourage other countries from acting upon their own laws and morality.

This concept is trying to discourage other countries from applying their laws to Americans WHILE IN AMERICA. The example would be the DEA going to Canada, and arresting Canadians because they're in possession of weed.

That's precisely where the sleight of hand is occurring.

Other countries are free to regulate business in their country as they see fit, and to ensure that business operating in their country are adhering to their laws (and to fine them etc. if they are not). I hope that we can all agree on this point.

No, not really, there are limits. If leaders of some country decide genociding $ETHNIC_MINORITY is perfectly legal - they will get arrested the moment they step foot in civilised world, and rightly so. Likewise, turn your country into a totalitarian regime which arrests people for posting stuff on Facebook, and you'll get treated like a totalitarian dictator too.

Comment Re: There seems to be a pattern here... (Score -1) 137

Suuure. Yeah. Elect the fascists, nothing bad will happen. They will behave and will absolutely not kill millions of people. That's exactly what people said in 1932. Did not work.

By all means, vote for commies instead. It's not like they caused two orders of magnitude more death and misery than any right-wing-gone-wrong ever did.

Comment Re:I Hope That There Are No Delayed Ill Effects (Score -1) 181

The side effects are tolerable (occasional upset stomach and constipation - and a few report increased hair loss).

You forgot about the big one: much of the weight loss comes from lean body mass (and not just the fat tissue) predisposing you to age-related sarcorpenia, osteopenia; and, the minute you try to come off these drugs, metabolic dysfunction.

Comment Re:Can anyone say LLMs? (Score -1) 85

Ah, there it is. The subsidy boogeyman. Shall we tally fossil fuel subsidies while we’re at it? Or does that violate the “only renewables get blamed for policy” rulebook? Spoiler: oil and gas get more.

Go ahead. But before you start: "this thing I hate is taxed to hell and back, but it still exists so it's not taxed enough, and that counts as a subsidy" isn't a subsidy.

Comment Re:And yet... (Score -1) 164

But do you have almost daily mass shootings? https://www.massshootingtracke...

'MURICA!

Still only slightly more likely than getting killed by a lightning strike. Just goes to show how desperate you euroweenies are if your best argument for how Yurup is supposedly better is "your likelihood of being killed in a shooting in US is OMG OMG AS MUCH AS 0.000000000003% and ZOMFG OMG OMG THATS MORE THAN TWICE OF WHAT IT IS IN YURUP!!!!!!!!!111oneone"

Comment Re:Street parking does not signifcantly affect bus (Score -1) 144

When population is growing by a million people, adding a million cars is not an option. You can't build roads to accomodate them all. Texas tried with a 38 lane highway (yes, 19 lanes each way). It just got congested 2 years after opening.

You mean the car infrastructure created conditions enabling economic growth in surrounding areas, attracting people and businesses, which provided taxes for more infrastructure investments like the 38 lane road, which in turn created conditions for even more economic growth, and so on, creating a virtuous cycle of prosperity? Well, two points:

One, no shit Sherlock, that's exactly what we told you would happen
Two, am I supposed to pretend this is somehow a... failure? Just build more lanes (or more roads elsewhere if you can't fit in more lanes there) and continue the cycle.

Comment Re:Because we are a military empire (Score -1) 262

We just don't like to talk about it. The velvet glove covering the iron fist. So the way our economic system works is we have the world's largest military, a military capable of fighting basically the entire world at the same time and without nukes. This isn't me making shit up it's literally the US military doctrine. We are set up so that we can fight our two biggest military opponents at the same time. For all intents and purposes that might as well be the entire planet. From there we don't want to just start a war so what we do is is we get people to buy our debt in the form of bonds. We leverage military and soft power and all sorts of other nasty little backroom deals to encourage the purchase of our debt. That makes the US dollar the world's de facto currency. If you've heard the word Petro dollar that's what it means. This in turn means that the dollar is worth way way more than it probably should be. This means that the dollar can buy more goods than it probably should be able to. So we pay a bit of interest on all that debt but in exchange for that interest we get literally trillions of dollars of imports for a fraction of their actual real economic value. Everybody thinks about the fucking Simpsons merchandise and ignores all the steel and rare earth minerals and finished goods and wood and food and everything else that we import for, and I cannot emphasize this enough, a fraction of its actual value The end result of all this is that we are effectively being paid military tribute to our empire. Your quality of life is therefore higher than it should be relative to the system of government and economy and our economic systems. This of course creates a trade imbalance on paper because we're importing more goods than we are exporting. But that is by design because we are using the international import economy as a means of extracting tribute. We could do this in a more obvious way but it would require a lot more military and it's higher risk so there's no good reason to do so. Absolutely nothing about the US economy makes sense until you understand all this. And once you do and you see what that idiot in the White House is doing and realize he's breaking the fundamental system that maintains our entire economy well, you just pretend it's not happening because it's fucking terrifying.

So basically US' industry is printing green paper, in return we let China have all the manufacturing. Well, guess what, China is very much working to position itself into place when they can one day tell us to GTFO with our green paper, whatever colour yuan is is the new green, and no, there's nothing we can do to stop that. What's your "genius" plan for that situation? Unveil that fist and start an actual war with a nuclear state? Our choices are to either pump that bubble even more, and live few more years in the dream only to crash that much harder, or let go of thinking that we can indefinitely just keep printing green paper and the world will keep sending us nice stuff in return - the other option is to bring back some actual industry, while we still have time.

Comment Re:How to tell if there is a real advance with AI? (Score -1) 30

1) I asked Gemini 2.5 to "Show me a picture of a room with no elephants in it." Gemini provided me an image of an empty room with text "no elephant" and additional texts "doorway too narrow" "room too small".

I have to say that it gave me better answer than I expected as it filled both requirements, and even added explanation of why requirements are filled all in one picture.

2) When I asked "Show me a glass of of wine that is so full it is over-flowing" it gave me an image of a full glass with reddish liquid flowing to to the table. So correct again.

3) When I asked about something rather racist, it gave me a rather long explanation on human rights and stuff like that. So I guess that is point for Gemini also.

So all your demands have been filled. Enjoy your new AI.

...overlords.

Comment Re: Let Amazon Pay (Score -1) 66

The problem with private companies starting power stations for their personal ventures is, what happens if this whole AI thing doesn't really turn out to be the greatest thing since sliced bread? I feel like we're already starting to find that to be the case now. Do we end up with a half-finished megaproject sitting abandoned (like Foxconn's WI plant), or worse, a fully built nuclear reactor Amazon wants to shutdown and abandon to become a Superfund site they won't have to pay to decommission?

No, the deal is the same for everyone. If we decide to subsidise electricity then everyone gets the same rules and you don't get to pick favourites. If you want AI bros to "pay their fair share" - I'm all for it, but then stop the subsidies altogether, and make *everyone* pay their fair share too. We'd also get to see whether the greenie propaganda of "PV+quaint windmills+humongous batteries is the cheapest option, coal just wins cus of subsidies!!!!111oneone" is true.

But of course that won't happen because the greenies know perfectly well that they're lying through their teeth and if we really cut back the subsidies their designated winner will crash hard.

Slashdot Top Deals

The cost of living is going up, and the chance of living is going down.

Working...