Tesla before Musk came along was three guys with a logo and grandiose ideas about how cool it'd be to make an electric car.

Directly quoting the Mozilla blog post: "For a hardened target, just one such bug would have been red-alert in 2025". Yus, totally "infantile". But yes, I guess Bobby Holley who wrote this, whose credentials are, oh, only "CTO of Firefox", obviously has no clue WTF he's talking about, knows way less about severity of those bugs than you do without even knowing what they are, and is one of those "weak minds". Instead we should defer to the wisdom of armchair specialist like you. Or, oh, I know, I know, everyone who says something that contradicts you, like him, is knowingly and deliberately lying, because of course any preexisting bias of such a "strong mind" as yours can't possibly be false, right?

Do you even realise how fucking pathetic you are in your stupid attempts at dismissing this?

No. As long as "another program" is "common consumer software like a browser" rather than "hardcore theoretical comp sci construct demonstrating something". You can't automatically prove halting on ALL recursive problems, but if you allow a solution of "I can't auto-prove correctness of this loop, so I'm going to rip it out and replace it with simpler code" then a magical computer program fixing all bugs does not break halting problem. When was the last time a "I can't prove this loop terminates on all inputs and that's okay" was an acceptable piece of code in common computer software?

I wonder if you feel the same about people immigrating here on H1Bs, or techie jobs being offshored to India. Somehow I feel we're about to hear a "oh oh but that's lieks TOOOOTALLY DIFFERENT, and those H1Bs should be deported but but but it's for their own good, to stop them from being exploited or something!" kind of rant.

LOL, desperate, are we? The absolute last thing Elon is widely known for is "not immediately vocalising any thought that comes to his mind". If he really was a Nazi you'd have TONS of quotes to support that, and wouldn't have to resort to deliberately (yes) misinterpreting him waving his hands.

"Inevitably crashes"? And how exactly do you think is THAT going to happen? All those people using claude are all of a sudden going to abandon it? At worst some stock market bubbles will burst, but your fantasy of everyone of their users going "oh geee, I've been using claude for 6 months but I just read this random guy on slashdot saying it can't count 'r' in 'strawberry', and now I see the light and I'm dropping it THIS INSTANT" is not going to happen.

And even speaking of the stock market, I doubt you're actually putting your money where your mouth is and are shorting Anthropic, are you? No of course not, bet you have some excuse about "market staying irrational longer than you can stay solvent" or something.

Bullshit. You know how many trillions Big Pharma spent on trying to find the cure for "broken metabolism"? All those "broken metabolism" studies always went like this: they recruited all those "broken metabolism" ladies who claimed to be able to gain weight on a 1000 kcal diet. Then they put them in a metabolic ward on an *actual* 1000 kcal diet, as calculated by actual scientists. And gee, who would have guessed, invariably those "broken metabolism" ladies miraculously regain their ability to loose weight, at exactly the same rate as the control group.

Oh wait, turns out there's no such thing as a "broken metabolism", 1 molecule of glucose makes exact same amount of ATP for everyone, there's just ladies that suck at estimating their calorie intake. And basal metabolic rate is still most reliably computed from lean body mass. Oh, you're 30% body fat? And you think you're going to have high basal metabolic rate? LOL.

Maybe, if you're looking for someone other than yourself to blame for your problems (as that seems to be your thing) you should look to the people who told you that cardio is the way to get lean. No, the way to fix that is to build metabolically active tissue, i.e. muscle. I.e. lift weights. Do you even lift bro?

And who would have guessed, the antiobesity agents that actually work, the GLP-1s do do jack shit to your metabolism, they're just really powerful appetite suppressants, i.e. they shut your piehole for you. Gee, it's almost as if all those people saying "if you want to get thin, just shut your piehole and that's all" were right all along.

But yes, I guess YOU are the first human in history of science whoose body can break the law of conservation of energy and still gain fat while eating less than you burn. Either that, or you're full of shit. Geeee, I wonder which of these two options might be true...

No, that's a stupid *you* who thinks it's a "pretty big problem". Neither in the article nor elsewhere are there quotes from any actual scientists who consider this to be anything beyond mild annoyance.

I love how you accidentally admitted which side of the political spectrum wants the crackdowns here. Note how OP didn't say a word on republican vs democrat, MAGA, Trump, Bidet, etc.

LOL, what? The models are getting visibly better every iteration, at a speed which is frankly a bit terrifying even to observe, and you're claiming "no evidence"? I guess you still think they can't count "r" in "strawberry"? No, it's on YOU to provide evidence that the current trend is about to stop.

Conservation of energy? Duh? The *only* source of energy you have is solar irradiation (no, chips do not magically make their own energy), and you dissipate it passively as radiation as well. The only "problem" is distributing your heat away from hotspots like chips so they don't fry, like running a coolant loop through the entire thing, but otherwise your space station has exactly the energy balance of a rock floating in space 1 AU away from the Sun. What's the average temp of the Moon? Oh, it's minus fifty C.

Ah yes, those "cheap and getting cheaper every minute!!!!11" batteries that leftist propaganda is chock full of, but which are conspicuously absent at any dealership selling home energy stores.

Define "General Intelligence". As in an operational definition, i.e, a something like Turing test, that allows you to differentiate between AI and human. Oh, by the way, "human" also includes 5 year olds, ans your test must classify them as having "General Intelligence". Well?

Ah, nevermind, I see that your vision of "General Intelligence" is "follows the same politics as I do". Forget I asked anything.

Accidental, lol. Believe me, there's nothing "accidental" about this, they only act that way when called out.

I suppose you do whatever it is you do, purely for betterment of humanity and expect no wages paid in return? No? So why should the pharma industry be any different? And before you spew some variant of "but but but those profits are unreasonably high!", no they are not, just look at performance of pharma companies on the stock market. Pretty average returns, in line with other industries.