Iâ(TM)m not the only greybeard here wondering exactly why this question is being asked, since most *NIX heads here fully remember the boot burden of spinning rust, which upgrading that single component contributed to a massive savings in boot time.
I'm long retired and can still bore youngsters with tales of the IBM 1620 and punched cards. Now, I'm running a Dell Optiplex 980 that's at least a decade old and still uses spinning rust. It uses Fedora 43 and Xfce, and the timing on my last reboot looks like this:
~$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 1.693s (kernel) + 3.855s (initrd) + 33.899s (userspace) = 39.449s
graphical.target reached after 33.898s in userspace.
~$
Of course, I'm sure that if I were using Gnome, the timing would be double that, but that's one of the reasons I'm using Xfce.