It's for training LLMs to control robots without having to build the robot or the training environment in the real world.

I think they should, yes, but when advertising is employed I'm that way hyperbole seems allowed. Also they can claim they will match prices if you ask.

To folding phones, of course. But some people haven't caught on to the fact that Apple copies literally everything. Everything people think was pioneered by the iPhone was actually introduced by the Samsung F700 which was released months earlier.

It's insane nonsense anyway, Apple is especially known for releasing lemons on the first try. It's axiomatic even among Apple's longtime fans that you never buy the first version of anything from Apple. Only the noobs don't know this.

Whether someone is an asshole is orthogonal to whether they are correct.

It's also irrelevant when considering who should be replying to public comments. The answer is "anyone who can and wants to"

I disagree. It's not heavy AI processing if you're not doing a lot of processing per request, which only happens when you have a large model.

Obviously false as written

It's not illegal to pay off a ransom for your data. It should be, but it isn't.

The AI companies haven't had their IPOs period

Sounds like you're describing the US.

It's not illegal unless you tell him you're going to get him the best price and then knowingly don't. That's fraud.

Those aren't "Heavy" AI tasks. All that time you spent supporting child rapists has broken your brain to the point it's now not good for anything else, either.

I'm old and out of touch, but I've never heard of either of those even in passing. If they were actually big we all would have.

I'm sure a lot of someones are doing that. But what will they do with the result? Since it's derived from the original, it's a derivative work...

Of course it does, but that's not "Heavy" AI tasks. Lightweight model, lightweight task.