So here's what I suggest for the Note takers Bill of Rights:
1) The speaker will speak slowly and coherently when they want their ideas/opinions/facts propagated.
2) The speaker will pause between subjects, sort of like a new chapter in a book.
3) The speaker will use transitional phrases between subjects.
4) The onus is on the speaker that the note taker got your thoughts right.
5) The notes are owed by the note taker, and not subject to evaluation.
My other suggestion is to get the meetings transcribed like with court reporters (stenograph machines?), so everyone knows what was said.
The IT department claims that it costs too much to roll out a new OS and rebuild all the remote management tools, train the Neytwork staff in the new OS (but not any end users), and pay for upgrades for 2000+ PCs...
Or should I say: COMPUTE Object-Oriented-COBOL = Rocks * Rocks.
P.S. The code would have been ALL CAPS, but the Slashdot filter wouldn't allow me to put in the code PROPERLY! LOL!
I am a hacker, enter my world...
Mine is a world that begins with school... I'm smarter than most of the other kids, this crap they teach us bores me...
Damn underachiever. They're all alike.
I'm in junior high or high school. I've listened to teachers explain for the fifteenth time how to reduce a fraction. I understand it. "No, Ms. Smith, I didn't show my work. I did it in my head..."
Damn kid. Probably copied it. They're all alike.
The aim of science is to seek the simplest explanations of complex facts. Seek simplicity and distrust it. -- Whitehead.