So what you are saying is we should eat you?

Is anything in your life not about Trump?

I read that whole blurb with my brain replacing AI Bloodbath with Climate Catastrophe. It works both ways.

I was not aware that Spain had a "right to housing". My understanding was that Spain was not a communist country. Who has to provide this housing that the Spanish citizens have a right to?

I'll notify all the news desks.

Let's assume all the doom and gloom predictions actual come to pass. Would that not mean that the banana production would simply slowly migrate north and south away from the equator over hundreds of years? Oh my god! How will we ever adapt to survive this change!

I know a lot of used car salesmen but I donâ(TM)t trust much of what they say when their entire income depends on convincing me of one particular point. That said. Ask your friends about the heat island effect. Then ask them why itâ(TM)s not in the predictive models. Then ask them about the confounding countryside stations in England. Then ask them why the summary of the last UN IPCC report diverges so widely from the actual reportâ(TM)s contents. Finally ask them about prediction normalization in the models and how itâ(TM)s done. Run down their answers and perhaps you will know a bit more than you do know. You can end ip at the same position as you are now but at least it will be an informed position.

I canâ(TM)t wait for the Shakespearian spin on how trying to lower drug prices is the same as setting up higher fences at Dachau.

The one involving pillsâ¦

You are so blinded by your acute TDS and drunk with all the koolade that you failed to notice that my one sentence post was not a legal analysis of the Trump EO but rather me poking fun at your foaming mouth rant.

Thank god the TDS pills are set to go down in price by the other "disaster" Trump caused this week.

Any time a timeframe of data is used to make a point you need to ask yourself "why did they pick the particular start date?" In the vast majority of cases it is because the data before the start date destroys the point they want to make. See for yourself and follow the claim to it's source and try to get the full picture.

What was sea level doing 2001 years ago? (And why is that data being ignored?)

I don't make the rules. I am merely telling you the result from decades of data. "The rich" are not sending their kids to public school. The irony, is most private schools spend way less per pupil and get considerably better results. https://alec.org/article/incre... PS. When you say "The Rich", who do you mean? Do you have a set amount above which everyone is rich and below which everyone is Poor? Or are there 3 levels? Rich, Average, Poor? If so, how do you see yourself? Not trying to be too nosy but this perception phenomenon is very interesting to me.

If you looked at public education spending you will notice that no matter how much is spent per pupil, and how much it goes up year over year, there is no increase in education outcome. Using education spending as a comparison in your argument is not the best idea. Full EV drivers should not get to ride on roads paid for by fuel taxes for free. I have no issue with making them pay their ACTUAL "fair share".