Dawkins is right. Detractors are just clinging, faith-like, to the idea that our brains are somehow magically more than computation devices

So the solution to too much AI slop to add tools to create more slop...?

rest assured they are counting it. One bank ceo yesterday told tech staff they were "expected" to use the AI tools being made available to them

some git front ends like bitbucket will intercept the Ctrl-F keystroke to bring up their own search box

&lt;quote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where I drive, you simply can't leave any more distance when traffic is heavy: if you leave reasonable space between you and the car in front of you, someone will pull in. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/quote&gt;<br><br>Why is this a problem? Just because others drive unsafely, does not oblige you to do likewise.

Except that to do this you first assume uniform distribution of impacts wrt time...

2000+ employee firm in Boston and London

mandatory install of iphone profile to enable the MITM to work "transparently"

Tony Smith's articles on the history of micro-computers does this far better:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/01/acorn_archimedes_is_25_years_old/

Can anyone zoom in enough to spot the price sticker? I reckon the charge to upgrade for existing users isn't going to go down too well...

I think the risk analysis should be trivial: Likely more children will die from asthma attacks and accidents due to teachers being unable to call for assistance on their mobiles than will be saved from "radiation".