But I thought the way it worked is a bunch of workers agree to strike if their demands are not met.
That's done by majority vote. If 49% of the employees want to work, they will often be prohibited either because the business requires most people to be working or the company can't run at all (think steel mill) or they'll be physically threatened.
Right, that's why my karma is maxed and you have to post anonymously because it actually makes your posts more visible.
"totally fair and level headed people". This is the "benevolent dictator" fallacy that is thousands of years old.
In the unlikely event that a person can be found that initially qualifies, it won't last. As Lord Acton observed, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
I'm sure people in here will chime in calling me a psychopath, maybe a people pleaser.
No, I wouldn't argue for either of those points. But I would argue that you work for a terribly-managed, poorly-led company that I want to know the name of so I can pull my investments out. And I would argue you aren't a very good team lead or manager if you can't be away for a few days without an emergency arising that requires your Immediate Attention to Fix.
It was a University environment, and well, let's just say that there were gender politics involved. The "appropriate" hires knew they could pick and choose what job tasks they would do or not. At least until a downturn. So it is perhaps ironic that I had some job security over them. Sorry. If you worked for a good company and were a good leader, you could step away and take leave and not have to worry about things going well while you were away.
In actual business practice, employees seldom negotiate their wages. They just take what they get. Those who do negotiate, do so with their boss, their boss's boss, and/or someone in personnel.
Unions are blind to individual merit. Those who want unions are slackers or people who see themselves as helpless victims.
In some states, in some companies, union membership is mandatory. Part of pay goes directly to the union. Of the union's portion, a small part goes to wage negotiation and other valid employee concerns, some goes to union thugs to make trouble, and some goes to payoffs to mostly Democrat politicians.
Legally mandated corruption.
So you've updated components of the Android or iOS operating systems, through an APK or IPA? Impressive!
You're still embarrassing yourself. I'm embarrassed for you at this point.
This is not even vaguely close to true,
This made me laugh. You made this statement and then followed it with other statements that confirm the opposite.
Windows, Linux, and MacOS *all*... - Allowed installers to do anything they wanted, including replace core OS files. - Allowed unsigned installers. - Allowed software to write to memory and then execute whatever was just written. - Allowed full access to memory to applications. - Allowed passwordless logins. - Had no (or weak) memory protection. - Used unencrypted disks. - Had no secure OS upgrade process. - Had no built-in firewalls.
Now, what was that you were saying about security was a major concern when building those old OSes?
You are just embarrassing yourself now - serving more as entertainment than anything else.
To answer your question - Why don't we talk about how badly Windows One sucked. Or that I've done everything you claim iin Windows machines.
But seriously - I know you are getting pissed that people don't understand, and are willing to go down in flames in your support for Windows, but this is getting a little cringy at this point.
Words matter. I said the Linux desktop market isn't large enough for hackers to care about. it's literally in the part of my post that you quoted. Heartbleed was a problem for Linux servers, where Linux dominates, with more than 60% of the market. So yes, that's plenty enough for hackers to care, and they have indeed gone after Linux servers. Heartbleed is just one of many. https://www.exploit-db.com/sea...
Mac and Chrome have been mostly left alone because they, like the Linux desktop, have a small share of the market.
Just a simple question - A simple yes or no will suffice.
D you believe that Windows is just as secure as Mac??
Newest question - Why am I wrong in saying it is not? Having extensive experience in Mac and Windows, and a goodly amount of Experience in Linux. My thesis is that any OS can be exploited. There are approximately 100.4 million people using Macs in 2024.
Many like myself have multiple Macs
In addition, many MacOS users use no AntiVirus software.
Mac users are considered less tech savvy than Windows users.
This would indicate that MacOS computers are seriously low hanging fruit, so easy to hack that it would be foolish for the bad guys to exploit.
I am really excited for you to educate me. I'll pass your answer along to the other people who like me, aer wrong and stupidly believe that Mac and Linux are more secure.
In full disclosure, I have a VPN, 2 forms of AV, Block scripts and ads. I'm not foolish enough to believe that Macs are some sort of impermeable fortress. Scan daily and remove the computers from the internet when not in use.
But please, I'm always willing to be edumacated.
The border collie helps round up the cattle but it would be easier if the rancher knows where the cattle are located to send out the collie. Some ranches can be hundreds of thousands of acres. And that is the main herd. If there are stragglers, they have to be located too.
Border collies generally work with sheep, cows not as much simply because cows don't really give a damn.
But sheep you have to be careful with - an entire flock in the UK had to be euthanized because they figured how to escape their fencing, and if that knowledge spread, it would basically render all farms using that fencing to keep sheep worthless. They apparently are very good at teaching fellow sheep things like that, and it was only a matter of time before the one or two that figured out how to escape taught the rest of the flock, and that flock would then teach neighboring flocks on neighboring farms and so on. It was cheaper to euthanize the flock than to have the entire country's farms re-fenced.
The entire mission is obviously an AI fake. As acclaimed physicist Joe Rogan explained, they crew would be dead once they'd hit the Van Allen Radiation Belt (tm)
That should've been obvious by the fake globe Earth image they reportedly sent back after launching.
The earth is flat. Not a globe. The fact they had to publish this image shows the whole thing is fake.
Bison don't produce as much methane as cows
The moving cursor writes, and having written, blinks on.