Did you read the paper you linked? It shows 80-90% of people are plugging them in, very different than what you posted.

And it never crosses your mind that the people ignoring the wrongdoing and saying "BUT BUT BUT, maybe this thing happened 30 years ago to someone with the same name or maybe not?" have less than honest intentions?

Weird, people keep telling me that I oppose nuclear power. I don't think I do, but whatever, I guess crazy conspiracy guy knows better.

Sorry to burst your ego bubble, but shitposting on forums does not have the kind of effect on the real world that you think it does. Good luck with the keyboard warrior thing, though.

This. I was studying various machine learning techniques over a decade ago and everyone involved talked about them as being under the umbrella of AI. Any divergence of terms happened so long ago that it's not worth recognizing anymore.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... commonly referred to as a micro hybrid. The car needs to use electric power for certain things which would normally run via serpentine belt while the engine is off. So it is using electricity instead of gasoline, just not for propulsion.

I don't see any mocking in that link.

They were applying to be, and I quote "social welfare organizations", which cannot engage primarily in political activity. Then all these "Tea Party" this and "Patriot" that organizations popped up trying to funnel money into political causes masquerading as "social welfare organizations". So many conservative organizations were doing the same thing, and using the same words to describe themselves, it made them very easy to find. Just an example of bureaucracy being efficient for once.

They were filing as non-political non-profits. They were not allowed to engage in political activity, but they were organizations whose expressed purpose was to support political candidates. Not anyone's fault but theirs that they got caught.

You're claiming that plants are a permanent carbon sink?

538 had Trump with about a 30% chance to win on election day. It's like rolling a dice, seeing a 5 or a 6, then proclaiming that anyone expecting 1-4 are morons.

This is a strawman. Most environmentalists have no issue with nuclear power. It just seems that nobody (regardless of environmental concerns) wants it in their backyard.

0.1% of 6 billion is 6 million, not 60 million. I'd guess their IT dept was probably in the 100 person range, sounds like you worked for a very small one or had a limited view of what "IT" encompasses.

These articles don't say what you're suggesting. I didn't see anything in them predicting that more hurricanes would be hitting the US specifically. They predicted stronger hurricanes (which has been happening) and more hurricanes (which has been happening), but I didn't see anywhere saying "more of this will happen in the US". Generally they just say, correctly, that warmer weather produces more storms.

They were not registering as political organizations. They were registering as 501(c)(4)'s, which are social welfare organizations. They are allowed to engage in political activity, but it cannot be their primary focus. Many of these organizations were created exclusively to engage in political activity. They were breaking the rules, it's not anyone's fault but theirs that they got caught.