Comment Re:What a win for xAI (Score 1) 51
Ahh, for the confidence of an engineer when faced with a problem they have no familiarity with. Yep, I bet it's that easy and you're the only one brilliant enough to have cracked the code!
Ahh, for the confidence of an engineer when faced with a problem they have no familiarity with. Yep, I bet it's that easy and you're the only one brilliant enough to have cracked the code!
I don't know if you know what a nuke is. It's a bomb with enormous destructive power, capable of leveling a city.
I don't know if you know what OpenAI makes. It's a computer program that spits out text based on probabilities. It is not capable of leveling a city, but it CAN also make terrible porn, and get lawyers sanctioned for making up bullshit.
So... um... what are you talking about?
Also we're all going to be attacked by unicorns.
Seriously, read less science fiction and pay more attention to the actual world around you. You're worried about fantasies, while the real world is more dangerous.
Yes. They are. Your wondering is exactly correct - this is not an open question, AI is leading to a 0% reduction in headcount. It is just an excuse.
[citation needed]
No, you don't. What a weird post.
Or even more likely, this bullshit is made up entirely.
You can't, right? There's no primary sources in the slashdot post. There's no primary sources in the article. This is made up bullshit.
BWAHAHAHAHA
Oh my god. You say these things like you actually BELIEVE them. That's... astounding. "Conservatives recognize their take is biased."
1. We're talking about American politics. There are no conservatives in american politics.
2. I'll assume you're talking about right-wingers.
3. Please provide any support - any, at all - for the proposition that "The American Right, writ large, recognizes their take is biased."
Let's forget the BEVY of inaccuracies in the rest of what you wrote. Provide some support for the basic proposition you start your screed with.
The EAS has been under review for years. The replacement project was kicking into high gear under Biden, then Carr fired the woman in charge. Now they're claiming this is some new program?
You're right - it doesn't make you a Nazi. But, if a bunch of Nazis support you, it's incumbent on any decent human being to ask "why are the Nazis supporting me." If Nazis are supporting you, it probably means that you're doing something wrong.
Also, and this isn't really the point, but did you really just compare drug dealers to Nazis? Rethink your life, man.
How about this one: "Gas chromatagraphy better than the human nose at determining differences between two specific chemical compounds." I would be willing to bet a HUMAN given the output of the gas chromatagraph would be at 100% accuracy too.
"predict the top five odor keywords based on the chemical contents of a whisky."?!? What the holy hell is this nonsense? "Computers better than humans at moving a cursor precisely 100 pixels, robot dominance soon to follow."
I'll bite - how would that dramatically reduce costs? Doctors' salaries account for about 6% of America's 4.5 trillion/year healthcare spend.
What bugged me at first about this write-up was the use of "pro bono." These lawyers aren't working pro bono, IE free. They're working on contingency. Not in any way the same thing.
Second, there is zero proof of what this guy is saying. And given the fact that he's suing the city council for *SIX HUNDRED MILLION,* no reason to believe it.
This might be the actual dumbest thing I've ever heard. That's not what a use case is.
"I've seen the forgeries I've sent out." -- John F. Haugh II (jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US), about forging net news articles