Comment Re:C (and here are somemore chars to satisfy the b (Score 2) 38
Comment Re:Discipline (Score 1) 29
Or "Teacher don't teach no more". Looks like there were infinite variants of this.
There were also follow-on verses with lines like "laughing to the sight of the burning of the school" and "marching down the corridor to kill the principal". Given that it was sung by seven-year-old kids whose parents probably sang it too, I don't think anyone took it too seriously.
Comment Re:Quantum Resistant Encryption (Score 2) 35
Comment Re:Why Greece? (Score 5, Insightful) 26
I assume they'd already jurisdiction-shopped and were expecting it to be rubber-stamped in a country that's somewhat more dysfunctional (try setting up a business in Greece some time) than other EU countries which would have given them a harder time over it.
If only those pesky Europeans were like the US, put Kushner on your board of directors, make a donation to the ballroom, and all of your regulatory problems just... go away.
Comment Re:Are there people in the government (Score 5, Funny) 77
Comment Re:I'm wetting my pants now (Score 1) 66
Moving off a platform that auto-expires constantly in order to force you to migrate to a newer ($$$) platform that will also auto-expire shortly after you move to it does seem to be a good idea.
For reference, we recently declared VC++ 6.0, from 1998, unsupported, not because there's a problem with it but because getting it to run under the latest Win11 is too hard. Having said that, binaries built using VC++ 6.0 still run fine under the latest Win11, and that's a nearly 30-year-old dev.system which, admittedly, is quite a bit better than what MS is shipping today.
Comment Re:Random ass "decisions" (Score 5, Insightful) 40
Comment Re:Hilarious (Score 2) 52
Comment Re:Why is slashdot posting these garbage articles? (Score 1) 155
Comment Re:Zuck loves Trump. Fuck Zuck (Score 1) 84
Comment Re:So what are VISA investors buying? (Score 1) 72
Comment Re:burner phone elsewhere will always exist ... (Score 4, Insightful) 166
They also won't impact their use by scammers:
Percentage of scammers affected by the proposed rule: 0%
Percentage of domestic abuse victims affected by the proposed rule: 100%
Not saying that this is deliberate, but that this is one of those simple, obvious solutions that's completely wrong.
Comment Re:First post! (Score 4, Informative) 29
It's not solid-state, it's pseudo-solid-state, also known as marketing-solid-state.
Unfortunately the web site doesn't specify which of the pseudo-solid-state technologies it uses.