Works pretty well for me:
Wait which WoT were you talking about?
Can't believe no one's mentioned him yet. Guy's done Star Wars, Doctor Who (twice), Indiana Jones, Game of Thrones... He's basically living our dreams.
Imagine a beowulf cluster of those.
Man if I could troll like that I'd sure sign my name.
Of course, unlimited means unlimited so I don't know why it's limited, but as a practical matter there you go.
I was sent a warning message about this, I'm still grandfathered in on the unlimited plan. I looked at my usage and over 4G of traffic was from facebook... apparently because I was auto-playing videos. Turning this off on an iphone requires you to go to the settings menu on the phone (not, confusingly, the settings menu in the facebook app, but the facebook app settings in the phone settings menu). You can set it to auto-play only on wifi or never.
So you are saying that government can be the solution to some problems when they are at the will of the people and when people aren't lazy and ignorant we can keep them from being the cause?
I never bought political one liners. Thanks for understanding there is nuance and a middle way.
"The skies should belong to the people, not the government. "
You mean the government for and by the people? The ones we elected to make up that list? Your exercise of writing those letters shows regulations should be at the behest of the people and this isn't us vs them.
So please drop this "people or government" dichotomy. This sets us all back. It's ignorance, it goes against your point and tells people the government isn't ours to control. It's how we get regulations we don't like. Instead keep the first half of your sentiment and we can have both, regulations by and for the protection of people.
Communication goes two ways, and offense is in the ear of the behearer if you will. If you didn't mean to offend, then you made a mistake or you don't care. If you didn't mean to offend once but now know that you're offending, then either you don't care or you intend to offend.
Wise people will make a good-faith effort to avoid giving offense by learning and practicing diplomacy.
If your view that intention is all that matters were true, then all the racists in the world could just intend really hard that no one should be offended and we'd be peachy.
If openssl were closedssl, do you think we would have learned about the exploit sooner? I don't.