You're misunderstanding the issue here. This isn't about them promising some feature down the road and it not being present yet. This is the developer promising a feature and not delivering the feature. That is very relevant.

I'm not going to weigh in on who is worse between the two. However, there is definitely more wrong with him as a candidate than people disagreeing with his opinions. At best, he is willing to say anything to get votes. This includes coming across as a sexist/racist. At worst, he is exactly as he portrays himself to be...

Well, no. The ISP wouldn't normally have access to the VPN logs.

I saw that as well. I'm glad they're at least taking steps to improve on that front.

I can only remember hiding apps that I didn't want. I really don't care enough to find an iPhone to figure it out. Quick list would be things like iBooks, stocks, podcasts, safari.

It almost sounds like you're saying the problem doesn't exist on WM or iOS. I can tell you that iOS comes with multiple apps I don't care about. I don't know enough about WM to make that claim. However, I do know that different people want different things. It wouldn't shock me if some people don't like all the stock apps for WM.

Based on atmospheric density at even the lowest point of LEO, no they cannot.

The computer is totally yours. The OS isn't. It is a fine distinction, but important.

You're trying to equate a single person with two different names to being the same as two separate persons. Don't like the wording of the 22nd amendment? Fix it.

See, that's the problem with people. We honestly need to expect a certain level of competency from people. There is something to be said for safety features, but you need to set an expectation on the user as well. You cannot expect the company to cover for every possible idiot.

I love Chrome, but agree completely. It's, unfortunately, just the way it's designed. My Windows usage of Chrome is almost exclusively not on battery, but my phone and tablet suffer greatly under any remotely prolonged usage.

The point of my statement was that the driver is supposed to be able to respond in emergency situations and not rely upon the autopilot. I didn't say there couldn't be a problem with the autopilot, just that the onus is on the driver.

If the accident was preventable, the driver should of prevented it. They should be paying attention to the road and be in a position to respond. If it wasn't preventable by the driver, then the system is working at least as well as the driver in that situation. Either way, the system isn't responsible.

And for what it's worth, that doesn't mean the system couldn't/shouldn't be improved. It just means they didn't die because of the system.

That statement doesn't say anything at all, implied or otherwise, about being able to drive without hands on the wheel. The fact that they say to drive with your hands on the wheel is rather explicit.

Or, better yet, hold people responsible for their own actions..