Columbia computer science professor Jason Nieh, who interviewed Google engineers as a witness in the case, testified that Aluminium requires a heavier software stack and more powerful hardware to run.
This just doesn't make sense. We're supposed to believe that the software now running on phones requires more hardware than the software now running on laptops?
I'm convinced Google is run by idiots. Look at ChromeOS Flex. With just a few tweaks, with the allowance of just a few desktop apps, Google would have a wide-open opportunity to make a serious run at Microsoft's home PC dominance because of the whole Windows 11 requirements issue. There are millions upon millions of perfectly good computers that are now going to landfills because of that, and they could all have Flex running on them if it wasn't for Google's short-sighted strategy. You can't even watch a DVD on Flex after Google shitcanned VideoLan from their approved apps list. They insist you use only Google stuff via the cloud. Such a damn wasted opportunity since Flex is easy to install and use otherwise, and a fairly pleasant user experience.
Remember "I will replace you with a very small shell script"?
We're essentially replacing people with a very big script now. But they are being replaced. The inevitable has arrived.
Nope.
>but there are plenty who could do low-end jobs and allow others to move up the food chain.
I love this idea that there are a bunch of people out there that aren't working but would otherwise work at *any job* if it paid the right amount. It's just not the case - unemployment is sitting at 4.5%. That's full employment.
One of the problems we have though is that women won't do these kinds of physically demanding and dirty outdoor jobs (how many women do you see paving roads or picking up garbage or working at oil derricks?), so that automatically halves the labor supply for these jobs, and of the able bodied young men, most won't work at these jobs because they were raised to expect a comfortable indoor environment. Everyone wants a desk/cubicle. Most of these infrastructure jobs have solid pay. Or even better pay. Doesn't matter. Most young men now would rather live with less money than take such jobs. Raise the pay to 80 grand on these if you like. Won't matter. Most young men won't work a job where they're out digging in hot weather.
Anyone who knows actual women knows that if a man is able to hold a job, be responsible and manage their finances and living situation most women do not care that much about what particular job a man has, you know most of them have their own jobs.
LOL, the first thing a gal's friends ask her about her new man is "What's he do for a living?". Every man on a date is asked about and judged by his career choices. There's great demand for eligible bachelors in medicine, finance, law, etc. The evening shift manager at Burger King isn't fairing as well on the dating apps, I assure you.
"Shot of liberalism"? You *are* talking about the company that's been fighting against its baristas unionising for years, right?
That really doesn't mean anything. Starbucks is one of those companies that likes social liberalism... because it's a great way to appeal to their prime customer base, which are urban and suburban women between 18-45. Think of it as virtue signaling used for marketing.
BUT... they don't like economic/labor liberalism. This is where companies like Starbucks and Target are free market to the core. In their view, they get the best of both worlds: the growing single female customer market (which is overwhelmingly Left-Liberal), and the Ayn Randian max-capitalism operating model internally.
How long are these people going to keep pretending that the elephant isn't in the room with them?
The upheaval in the early career job market has caught higher education flat-footed. Colleges have long had an uneasy relationship with their unofficial role as vocational pipelines. When generative AI burst onto campuses in 2022, many administrators and faculty saw it primarily as a threat to learning — the world’s greatest cheating tool. Professors resurrected blue books for in-classroom exams and demanded that AI tools added to software be blocked in their classes.
Only now are colleges realizing that the implications of AI are much greater and are already outrunning their institutional ability to respond. As schools struggle to update their curricula and classroom policies, they also confront a deeper problem: the suddenly enormous gap between what they say a degree is for and what the labor market now demands. In that mismatch, students are left to absorb the risk. Alina McMahon and millions of other Gen-Zers like her are caught in a muddled in-between moment: colleges only just beginning to think about how to adapt and redefine their mission in the post-AI world, and a job market that’s changing much, much faster.
What feels like a sudden, unexpected dilemma for Gen-Z graduates has only been made worse by several structural changes across higher education over the past decade.
First, a huge surge of undergraduates shifted to majoring in fields now being upended by AI. In the aftermath of the Great Recession of 2008, a long-running survey of college freshmen by UCLA found students much more focused on going to college to “get a better job” than on what they previously wanted most: to learn more about things that interested them. That new mind-set showed up in what they picked as a major in college. Between 2010 and 2020, fields such as philosophy, history, and English saw a big drop in popularity. The latter two majors fell by one-third in that ten-year period while overall humanities enrollment declined by almost a fifth. Where did they go? A lot pivoted to computer science and related fields.
Last year, the number of students majoring in comp-sci alone topped 170,000 — more than double the number from 2014, even as overall undergraduate enrollment fell. Many were responding to a steady drumbeat of advice from groups like Code.org and Girls Who Code, amplified by tech celebrities such as Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg and echoed by presidents from Barack Obama to Donald Trump, all urging young people to learn computer programming. Now, ironically, many of those same students are struggling to find work, as the entry-level positions they are seeking tend to be ones that are among the most affected by AI. College graduates in their 20s with computer-science and computer-engineering majors have one of the highest unemployment rates, according to a report last year from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — double that of pharmacy, criminal justice, and biology. Undergrads seem already too aware of this new state of affairs: Enrollment in computer- and information-sciences programs is down nearly 8 percent this academic year compared to last.
You can keep pretending that it's all just a plot by meanie corporate types, but increasingly these jobs are going away and aren't coming back.The technology is in the early stages and the bugs are being worked out, but the clerical/coder/desk work apocalypse is here. More human jobs will be lost to AI scripts every year. You can adapt to that reality, or pack your bags to move back in with your parents. The scripts will kill more desk jobs every year. If AI can do your job, then at some point, it will:
Employment growth for young workers has been stagnant since late 2022. In jobs less exposed to AI, young workers have experienced comparable employment growth to older workers. In contrast, workers aged 22 to 25 have experienced a 6% decline in employment from late 2022 to September 2025 in the most AI-exposed occupations, compared to a 6-9% increase for older workers. These results suggest that declining employment in AI-exposed jobs drives stagnant overall employment growth for 22- to 25-year-olds.
- Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence
I used them for several years, and they dropped out nearly every time it rained. Which wasn't just an inconvenience - I work from home.
I got a second ISP account with a local provider, who didn't have the best reputation for reliability, but I used them as a backup.
After I set up monitoring on the lines I realized my connection to the local ISP was actually really stable, and dropped Comcast.
It was a great decision. No calling to negotiate the price down every year, it works in the rain, and the people there are really nice. They cost about 1/3 what Comcast charged, too.
So it stands to reason, that should apply to robots, too.
So wait for Google to start offering advertisers "AI ads", where you can poison someone's agent context for a fee.
"But only relevant context poisoning."
You can run the gateway on anything.
Incoming international student numbers are down like a third, and dropping. Top schools in other countries with hiring budgets are gleeful. Once the current shifts, it doesn't come back - smart people keep going to the institutions where the smart people are.
The US is intentionally chasing folks off. If you take the National Security Strategy document seriously, the Trump admin is intent on shrinking the US from a superpower to a regional bully.
It will take a while to wind down - it was a really good thing. But long-term, say goodbye to being on top of the technical and economic heap.
Oh, so there you are!