TypeScript has a very very advanced type system that pushes the boundaries far beyond the old-same 80s-90 Java/C++ Object stuff.

And if you forked the very public legitimate project at https://github.com/anthropics/... they also DMCA'ed you and removed that fork, Despite the fact that it is is perfectly legitimate and considered normal on Github to fork public repos like that As an act of social support and in order to help find bugs and report them.

So I don't play that type of game. Has anyone here played those, and had the gambling feeling over these loot boxes? The summary is rather damning, but I'd like the opinion of an adult gamer.

Red. Frakking. Mine?

Sitting your moms basement looking at ASCII Art Porn and whining that the boobs are not open-source, written with Vi by other nerds does not qualify you as a UI engineer. And yet... these people wrote RedMine claiming that it is good because "ITS FREE!!!". Do you know what else is free? Syphilis. I don't want that either.

Seriously, Redmine is the ultimate expression of the concept of "Hack Job by Linux Nerds who think UI Design is for La-Di-Da College Types"

Redmine sucks donkeyballs.

It gets worse. The real lesson from AI?

Your job is so mindless and dumb that you can be replaced by a stupid statistical algorithm.

Linguistic drift and all that, being still in that awkward transitional stage. One of those things where expecting everyone to just jump into some new phrasing is a mighty big ask.

Bigoted scum like you lost the argument. In a Democratic Society, you get your way by winning the argument and then winning the vote. But your side didn't manage that. You lost, because the majority of people think your bigotry is laughable at best and should make you a pariah in any civilised Society.. And because your side lost the argument and the vote, they turned to underhanded tactics to try and get thier way anyway, undemocratically. But the civilised side isn't stupid and so noticed this underhanded tactic and voted it down. So your side lost again. And now, like the whiny little crybaby you are, you are bawling your eyes out about having lost and trying to misrepresent the facts of the case. You lost, get over it. Maybe try and join the civilised world instead of continuing to spread your bigotry and hatred, although I think that's unlikely. You'll just keep crying about how civilised people think you're a dickhead.

After looking further into this, it was indeed an amendment put in by bigots to try and wreck a piece of legislation they don't agree with but know they are in the minority on. The legislation was to cement recognition of trans women as women, and trans men as men. This amendment could have been used to bypass this because if passed, then if a trans man can get pregnant they would be a women not a man and this could then also be used to argue the vice-versa. It was an attempt to scupper a vote they were going to lose by making the legislation unworkable and was rejected on that basis.

Why would you need a regulation to say such a thing? What possible purpose could it serve? Are you suggesting that because they didn't vote to confirm this now men can get pregnant? Without knowing what the proposal actually was, or even if it exists outside some bigot's imagination, I suspect that this was part of some wider amendment designed to bake bigotry into regulation. They included that particular clause so that when it inevitsbly got voted down they could cite this to make it seem silly

I'm sure I'm not the only American that's willing to host and support The Free Press.

In America, UK has no power (since 1776)

Imagine the political possibilities if we hosted this on American soil on American servers.

Discord is about 10 years old now, so it canâ(TM)t quite come up yet that it would have accounts in use for 16 years. Still leaves the question about would this policy apply in such a case? If it does, that seems like it might imply Discord is treating the account as being used by someone other than the original owner. Which also raises questions.

Some have been wrong. Some have been delayed but eventually delivered. Some have been right. What most people seem to miss is that by setting insanely optimistic goals, it creates the possibility. Teams across his companies seem to be motivated to deliver more often than not, even if the optimistic deadlines slip. So why not set a push goal now and re-calibrate when physics or some other issue rises as they dig further into the problem?

Microsoft has progressively been making everything an instance of Chrome. They've seemingly altogether given up the notion of native platform rendering. The win32 api for native ui elements hasn't been touched in two decades. There have been a few failed attempts to move on from it like Siverlight, WinForms, UWP, LightSwitch, etc, but they never bothered to revisit their native UI library. So now everything is a Chrome instance.

My preference would be for them to focus on fast, native rendering again, maybe with a new 'win64 api'. But I'm not sure that talent or expertise exists at MSFT anymore.

I hope Bubba takes their lunch money for ransom and give them lots of slippery soap

... and I can assure you he is not mentally all there. They guy is pretty nuts to be honest.