Breach of contract here is pretty weak, as you can pull down most of this data without an account or even having to click through a TOS page. 3,4,5,7, and 8 fall away if 1 does.
Unjust enrichment might stick, but it's pretty weak, OLpC databases and subscriptions aren't going to dry up because the value here isn't in the data per se, but in the cooperive management of it. The fact Anna incorporates unlawful sources and has no real corporate identity means it's useless to library members. It's unlikely here that olpc can prove they've lost any actual business or revenue here. I doubt they can point to one library that has canceled services and decided to use anna's archive instead.
9. The only thing new here is increased server costs, which is still heavily reliant of the breach on contract theory. Trying to call the data in the database chattel property really isn't supported by law or any precedent that I know of.
11. Is just plain silly even if you consider the database as chattel, because data is not tangible and conversion requires the intent to deprive the owner thereof. Copying is not theft.