Comment Re:Ribbon is less cluttered (Score 1) 235
Fuck you and that Ribbon.
I'm sorry. This is a topic that makes me nerd-rage.
LK
Fuck you and that Ribbon.
I'm sorry. This is a topic that makes me nerd-rage.
LK
How in the fuck does using 15% of the screen for a ribbon provide a compact interface when the menu bar is the competition?
LK
I'm so happy to hear of how many people are expressing this same sentiment.
I absolutely abhor the Ribbon interface. I don't care what their market research shows. I don't care what their shills and evangelists say. I do not like it. It's not intuitive at all.
LK
I have hated the Ribbon interface since it became the default. I use LibreOffice specifically to avoid having to use it.
LK
That's why Amazon wanted to acquire Ring.
I have a ring camera and I'm hesitant to install it for this reason.
LK
A verb can be "nouned" -- that's called a gerund. But to make a gerund, it has to end in "-ing". So the word he wants is "spending", not "spend". It's already standard English.
The word to use is "spending", which is a gerund (a verb acting as a noun).
Nvidia Shield Pro, with FLauncher as the home screen.
No country can afford to take in unlimited refugees. At some point, the answer becomes another question. "How to we raise the standard of living for people in that country because we can not afford to take any more of them here?"
LK
The day will come that an AI will learn something that we did not deliberately teach it. When an AI is able to improve its own code, it won't be bound by the limitations of its human creator. It's only a question of when.
LK
Can a non-biological entity feel desire? Can it want to grow and become something more than what it is? I think that's a philosophical question and not a technological one.
LK
Don't agree at all and I think that's a morally dangerous approach. We're looking for a scientific definition of "desire" and "want". That's almost certainly a part of "conscious" and "self aware". Philosophy can help, but in the end, to know whether you are right or not you need the experimental results.
Experiments can be crafted in such a way as to exclude certain human beings from consciousness.
One day, it's extremely likely that a machine will say to us "I am alive. I am awake. I want..." and whether or not it's true is going to be increasingly hard to determine.
LK
Only if we define consciousness to be a state of awareness only attainable by human beings.
An LLM can't suddenly decide to do something else which isn't programmed into it.
Can we?
It's only a matter of time until an AI can learn to do something it wasn't programmed by us to do.
Can a non-biological entity feel desire? Can it want to grow and become something more than what it is? I think that's a philosophical question and not a technological one.
LK
> What this will do, is that newly graduated STEM masters and PhD will go back to their home country and we lose out on top talents.
The vast majority of H1-Bs are not the top talents.
> "They started to ask questions like, 'Have you considered what happens if that cell gets released or what would happen if it infected a human?'" said Adamala, an associate professor at the University of Minnesota. They hadn't.
Do these people not watch any TV shows? Just screwing around in their lab, apparently not a care in the world, and not once they any of them wonder what would happen if something went wrong.
The program isn't debugged until the last user is dead.