Comment Re:AI Database of Answers (Score 3, Interesting) 103
I will still trust a troll moderated Wikipedia over AI the drivel that is 95% truth and 5% complete Guillermo del Toro nightmare hallucinations. Even though I have stopped contributing to Wikipedia as it is impossible for me as an unmerited nobody to post anything without having it rolled back with a comment of "irrelevant", "wrong forum","lacking citation" (that was my fault) or "speculation" (yes I did speculate about a book cover being drawn in the same style as the Epic Adventure movie posters, like New Hope and National Lampoon's Vacation, but if you compare them you can't un-see it) - And yet, even if I'm being clobbered all the time, even on topics I think I can contribute, I believe this moderated mash is better than the artificial cud served by most LLMs. Not because the AI give the wrong answer, but because it is so vehemently pretending anything it presents is the truth. And I know all that nice fact is peppered with falsities and I have no way of telling how much until I try using that library (eg. SDL3) and find half the howto given by the AI is out of date (SDL2)