Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Get HideMyAss! VPN, PC Mag's Top 10 VPNs of 2016 for 55% off for a Limited Time ×

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Remember, victory is not really the goal. The object is to keep the match running.

They really do need Trump, and it shows, to the point it makes me suspect they hired him for the gag.

This is why we have Trump and Clinton at the top. They are the next level, little else, of a game that became readily apparent to me with Humphrey, and it has been played that way since.

I believe the intention there is to keep congress as close to 50/50 as possible to make it easier to pass blame back and forth in a game that is called "rotating villain",

It's nothing but *good cop/bad cop*, and you are a sucker

I've been telling you that there is no opposition between the Rs and Ds for years.

At this point the Rs and Ds work together more as a tag team than as actual opponents.

The politicians are just in it for the money, coke, and hookers. They are playing an entirely different game that the public does not want to acknowledge. They don't want to hear that they are being taken for a ride.

It still smells like they hired him for this.

He's the hired clown for the birthday party. The man is a democrat.

Yeah, I've grossly mischaracterized your position.

Bonus paranoia:

The Sanders campaign has always been against Stein, not Clinton

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Why? Because they're actually up for grabs.

I would be fascinated to see the research that leads you to this conclusion.

Asians aren't a sure thing for Republicans or Democrats.

This is doubtful.

Latinos aren't a sure thing for Republicans or Democrats (though they lean Democratic)

The numbers say otherwise, and that's before Trump opened his big mouth.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

I deny them nothing

You deny them everything. In your universe, Trump was "placed" into the race in order to make Hillary "look good". I keep calling out your lack of evidence for any of these assertions, and all you can do in rebuttal is waffle incoherently.

They get the respect they deserve

Fuck me you're clueless. This isn't about you saying mean things about people, it's about you valuing hokey conspiracy over human agency.

And they give Clinton her singular advantage of at least sounding like a grownup.

So? If you're going to shackle yourself and your party to nativism, scientific illiteracy and contempt for civil rights, what the fuck do you expect? Again, you need a less dumb conspiracy theory.

And when you stop playing the fool

Always stated, never demonstrated. God, you suck.

I will take you a bit more seriously also

Go fuck yourself, you narcissistic buffoon.

I'm not going to write War and Peace just you can have your high word count that only wastes my valuable time.

Of course not. You couldn't write a pamphlet on writing pamphlets.

The way you're acting, it's just not worth the effort.

Says the asshole Who. Keeps. Coming. Back. For. More. Over. And. Over. Again.

And besides all that, you should learn that short sweet sentences are all that is needed.

LOL, such a noob. Different tools for different jobs. But I guess when all you have is a micropenis...

A six second story does not need a 30 minute setup and the high drama to lure in an audience. Save that for the movies and soap operas. In and out, nobody gets hurt. Simplicity is god. Save the pity for yourself there, buddy.

But it apparently needs lot of short filler sentences that have nothing to do with what we're discussing and even contradict their supposed intent. Gotcha. You do know you spend more explaining yourself and your methods than you do actually discussing the subject? You really are a weak sister.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Just shared interests

Your Trump is a saboteur, and the act is working.

You may be right, but you've done fuck all work to reconcile those two statements. And again, you're being dehumanizing, denying both Trump his ambition, and denying the millions of voters who selected him any choice in the matter.

but I fully expect to hear you crying "fraud" and "money" instead, and the lesson will continue to go unlearned. It's always everybody's fault but your own.

Well yes, you think this stupid malarkey because you still think I'm a Democrat. Prepare to be disappointed.

Heh, playing the X-rated Dr. Smith from the TV series, I see.. Very funny. Talk about hitting a nerve... But the blame for misunderstanding is not only on your feet, it's smashing them flat, or maybe you prefer on your shoulders. Either way it looks intentional (only you can know for sure), and the reasons would be very clear. That's what denial is all about. Or you're just trolling. The reaction is priceless, as always, but as such you just can't be taken seriously. Maybe if you made an effort, that could change. Otherwise, like, you know, you could just give it a rest and accept the truth without saying a word. Makes no difference on this end. I'm lovin' it! I get both sides for the price of one.

I'm going to stop giving you shit for your poor english skills because when you actually make an effort to go past one sentence, it gets way way worse. May God have pity on you.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Or is playing dumb also part of the charade?

You tendentious twat. Don't fucking lay the blame for your poor communications skills at my feet.

As for Trump, I forgot you thought he was special. The DNC might have been given a rare gift, but it wasn't exactly sweating having to go up any of the other clowns in the GOP car. Go find a less weak conspiracy already.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Heh, barely.

Hmmm, looks like we have room for a bet. Care to propose some terms?

You should be very grateful for Trump

What for? I didn't like him during his first run-in with national fame 30 years ago, and nothing's changed since then. You do come up with some weird propositions sometimes.

You are in an anti-Miss America contest to see who can be the worst.

There's that reductive view again. Blinders need a little loosening perhaps?

Rubio, or even Bush or Kasich would cream you.

Once again, thanks for the bad faith "you", never change. Second, and in order: possibly*, no and no. Knock yourself out trying to prove otherwise.

And let's see how congress settles out.

Yawn. Dems might get the senate, won't get the House. Centrists get to be smug and ponies like you get to laugh at the gridlock. Almost everybody wins.

But, denial is just part of your game.

You keep saying this, yet never point out what I'm denying. You keep using this word...

*Not through any fault of his own, mind you.

Comment Re:Year of the... (Score 1) 516

Android is Linux with a customized shell. The fact that more people are using Android as their primary computer shouldn't be a surprise. This makes Android / Linux on the desktop. There is no real arguing that it is. It may not be YOUR idea of "Linux on the desktop", but it is Linux on the Desktop all the same. Add in Chromebooks (also Linux) and Google's intention to link Android Apps with Chrome at some point continues to make the case that Linux on the Desktop has arrived, and is much stronger than most people realize.

No, it isn't a "traditional" OS desktop, but it is one none-the-less.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Eh, if you can't be bothered

Wait, you're the one with anemic replies and I'm the one who can't be bothered? Some context for this non-sequitur would be nice.

You play the quintessential democrat that won't look in the mirror

Only to you. By my actual statements and behaviour I'm something much different, but nuance is a nuisance to you.

what is so repulsive and drives away the voters.

That's funny seeing as how that same repulsive Democrat will probably win the popular vote count in November. You keep using that word...

You are doing the republicans' work for them

Mind telling me how I'm managing that? Of course you won't.

and they for you

They haven't done shit for me since the 80s. You really suck at analysis.

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 1) 419

Sure.. You want to limit our choices to your preferred "lesser evil".

That's a lie.

You are illustrating the *dictatorship of the majority*.

No idea what this means, and you won't explain it, so, moving on...

You can fight your own wars.

No idea what this mean, etc...

You are merely the other bookend to the republicans that act identically to you.

Why yes, because I'm in favour of ignoring climate change, disappearing the welfare state, and hardline immigration policies. You're an idiot.

In fact, you're a bit more hyper about it. You are so alpha.

Now that's boilerplate!

You're like the guy who just talks louder, thinking that will make you understood.

Unlike you, I can actually answer a direct question, so I think I can live with myself here.

just part of your regular guilt trip.

You keep bringing this up without supporting evidence. Methinks you're a little more conflicted than you let on.

You got plenty of your own friends to help you pull that train.

You're still stuck on this label for me despite zero evidence for it, and repeated assertions against it. You're taking disingenuous to the next level here.

You don't need me for anything.

Correct, but you keep popping up like the turd gopher you are. No one's forcing you to reply to me.

You are shooting at the helicopter that drops you a line.

Ahh, I was wondering when the narcissism would show up.

Slashdot Top Deals

"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!"

Working...