Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:4 Day work week... (Score 1) 68

Our work week is artificial in the first place. Nothing stops us from going to a 4, or even a 3 day work week now. 40 hour work week is not a requirement other then some construct of what we deemed reasonable at the time. When we were "simple" hunters and gatherers, we really didn't have a '7 day' week. Everyone did was was needed, and as technology developed, we were able to relax more.

People had way more time on their hands in the past prior to industrialization. Technology achieved the opposite of relax more.

Comment Re:Air Conditioners save lives (Score 1) 171

This has nothing to do with AC. You don't need AC, these temperatures aren't remotely extreme. People are dying in Germany in temperatures where people are out sunbathing and enjoying themselves in in France. Thinking this is a lack of AC is an incredibly ignorant take on the issue.

The fundamental issue is society is built around a temperature norm, and that norm is breaking. Not AC or not AC, but everything we do as a society. We need to change our approach to heat in general and we'll be fine.

We don't need air-conditioning, especially not for a few days a year, we need to be more intelligent as a society. It's not that hot, people just think it is because they don't know how to deal with it. And judging by the "we need AC" comments here, you don't know either.

Jesus...what gives with the anti-AC nonsense? Heard from a number of Europeans complaining about how they don't have AC over the last few months. What a really weird thing to be against.

Think of ACs as air sourced heat pumps.. a way to reduce natural gas usage in the fall that just happen to also do the same thing as an AC during the summer. Is this more aligned with your sensibilities? Are you ok now not to hyperventilate over AC?

Comment Re: Begun, the AI price wars have... (Score 1) 40

As a local AI enthusiast I can tell you that it's not practical even with a large budget. For one thing the hardware is obsolete as soon as you buy it. In a few years that $30k compute card is worth $300.

This would be an awesome problem to have. My local AI enthusiast hardware is three years old and currently worth 4x what I paid for it at the time. At least when shit becomes worthless you can afford to buy better shit and get more value out of it.

With that said, even "old" AI is useful for some tasks but probably not what you'll want to use it for. The field is moving so insanely fast that newer models vastly surpass previous models and you want to be top top of that because the improvements are huge.

Personally don't see hardware requirements moving all that much. Much of it as I predicted three years ago is in large sparse models with limited numbers of active parameters. I can run everything I would want to run except K3 with good enough performance for my purposes. It is the sheer volume of RAM rather than compute or even memory bandwidth that seems to be the ascending limiting factor.

Comment Re:Social engineering. (Score 1) 92

Who died? Spanish citizens? Sources, please.
I'm not saying it isn't tragic that so many of the people suckered into this operation drowned

Who died? How can you not know? Have you done any research at all before forming an opinion of what did or did not happen?

The source is the mouth of the Mayor President of Ceuta during his address to the EU parliament on Aug 6th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Or if you prefer second hand press sources:

https://www.bbc.com/news/artic...
https://www.dw.com/en/ceuta-le...

but that was not the point of contention. Read the thread again, carefully.

I'm sorry I have no clue what you are trying to say. What was the point of the statement "In no time, pretty much all those who had crossed were back in Morocco and everything was back to normal." ? What did you intend to convey by this that is actually consistent with the facts of what took place?

Comment Re: Social engineering. (Score 1) 92

The entire concept of national borders is stupid.

Putler also doesn't believe Russia's borders end anywhere.

It plays the human race against each other as a lottery of where you born, as if there isn't enough inequality in the world.

The entire point of a state that governs itself with the consent of its citizens is advancement of the interests of the citizens of that state. It isn't fighting global inequality or advancing the interests of those in other states at the expense of their own.

And congrats on emphasising my point. The Spanish external border wasn't breached. 0 people reached the EU Schengen zone, and yet Italy decided due to the risk of those immigrants they suspended the Schengen agreement with Spain. Let me repeat using different words. Brown people outside the EU moved to somewhere outside else still outside the EU, and Italy decided to close an internal EU border, all to rile up a racist base who also doesn't like brown people - With this context do you understand what "nationalistic" means?

Unconstrained immigration is almost always a bad idea. It leads to failed integration, ghettoization, prejudice and resentment. This issue is turbo charging the rise of right wing politics throughout Europe.

Comment Re:Social engineering. (Score 1) 92

I'm going to assume you're not completely ignorant of the fact that the number of migrants that came in was *EQUAL TO THE POPULATION OF THE ENTIRE REGION*. So that means your "force" will either fail miserably, likely resulting in your own death or you have strong firepower and decided to massacre people.

Spain has a population of 50 million. They should have sent required forces to Ceuta to block or interdict the invasion well in advance and made its intentions known.

Why's that matter? Your stupid idea just killed many more than those you proclaimed to care about. You really say some spectacularly stupid shit sometimes.

Are you seriously asking why it matter that weakness is getting people killed? The trigger for this was a seemingly permissive supreme court ruling in Spain. Merkel for her part intentionally lit up a neon sign both showings of weakness resulted in needless death. If people know they will not be allowed to invade they won't bother to go in the first place which is the best scenario for everyone.

Comment Re:Social engineering. (Score 2) 92

If you want to take pictures out of context, there's plenty of pictures of what happened at the border: On the Spanish side all the border agents were there, standing there in full force unable to do anything. How many people do you think make up the border guard there, and what do you think they were going to do with an influx of 50000 people? Shoot them? Prevent people who just spent 5km swimming (some didn't make it and drowned) from coming out of the water?

You come in force and physically stop them and provide suitable transportation back to where they came from. More importantly is to make it known you won't tolerate invasion in advance so this shit doesn't take place to begin with.

Did you learn nothing from Gandhi?

Did you learn nothing from Merkel who got thousands of people killed with her come to Germany stunt in 2015? Weakness gets people killed, in this particular case over 100 people died to say nothing of a terrorized local population.

Comment Re:Social engineering. (Score 1) 92

Spanish government failed its citizens.

Nonsense. Except from the right-wing vultures abusing the images for politics and undermining EU unity (which was the intent of this campaign), there were no consequences Spain could have prevented with the border security or army. In no time, pretty much all those who had crossed were back in Morocco and everything was back to normal.

Jesus Christ, WTF are you talking about? Over 100 people are dead.

Comment Re: SSL for Wifi (Score 1) 36

Yeah, but that's a check of the client's cert, not the AP's.

The AP is irrelevant in all of this. Certificate validation occurs between the EAP server and supplicant. When the server is done it furnishes encryption keys to the AP for it to use.

There are approaches that do require the AP to have a valid cert, but how do you validate it when all the authentication happens on the other side of the AP?

The supplicant uses its trust anchor to validate the cert the same way any web browser would. The real problem is having a valid cert is completely meaningless because its identity is tied to nothing not even the SSID of whatever you are connecting to.

Comment Re: SSL for Wifi (Score 1) 36

WPA Enterprise has this covered. The certificate check occurs during the connection, prior to authentication. Procedurally generated credentials could be printed on to your tickets in advance, designed to work both at airports and during flights.

This solves nothing because anyone (including Defcon attendees) can obtain a valid certificate. What what is needed are secure authentication algorithms rather than endless parades of absurd band-aids that only make the lack of secure authentication even worse.

Using existing infrastructure and code one could do this quite easily using a PAKE rather than certificates for mutual authentication within EAP-TLS.

Comment Re: replacing with AI (Score 1) 120

I, for one, doubt we'll see air traffic control replaced by AI any time soon. The big reason is accountability. If one air traffic controller completely screws things up and causes a plane crash -- that person can be singled out, terminated, and things return to normal. If the AI they replaced the human workers with screws up and causes a plane crash? Now you're talking about years of ongoing investigation, arguments/debates and pressure to bring the human workers back.

I don't understand why it would be necessary to use "AI" rather than deterministic algorithms. All you are doing is calculating state vectors and telling people what to do to accomplish a preprogrammed goal.

Slashdot Top Deals

Life is difficult because it is non-linear.

Working...