An interesting perspective, but saying Microsoft has "a good track record in fending off competition" is like saying Muhammad Ali was "good at hitting his opponents in the ring"."Open source vendors have to recognise that Windows is here to stay and that together with Microsoft it will form a duopoly in the market for operating systems. This also requires that the Linux community respects Microsoft rather than ridicule it.
"There are some things that Windows does pretty well," Zemlin said. Microsoft for instance has excelled in marketing the operating system, and has a good track record in fending off competition.
So watch what you're doing on your iPhone, liberals--you may be next.
In a few posts to a recent article, I made a number of arguments for why businesses should consider open source software. I decided that it would be a very good idea to consolidate and put them together for greater coherence.
Some of you may have read "Last chance to see" by Douglas Adams. The book, a documentary about endangered species, describes how the Yangtze River Dolphin population declined drastically in just one or two generations. Those dolphins were not slowly killed by man for food. They simply died, because all those engine ships going up and down the river rendered their sonar useless.
It is now 3 years since a dolphin was last sight
This sort of attitude is exactly what annoys me the most, i.e. the explicit imposition of will without any concern whatsoever as to how it affects downstream "users" (whether ordinary users, or other programmers/coders). To me this shows exactly how the "Community" aspect of the "Open Source Community" is being destroyed by this debate.Better get used to it. You can't stop us. You can only complain.
"Thank heaven for startups; without them we'd never have any advances." -- Seymour Cray