There are far too many variables to do that successfully, and in any event you never know about the road not taken. Which is why I say no one can never tell you you were wrong.

No True Scotsman fallacy.

Am I confused, or was the pedestrian crossing the road who was hit by the ledt-turner in the video, which was of course not a real video of a real collision, crossing against what would have been a red walk sign? I'm not aware of any intersections where pedestrians are allowed to cross while left turns can be taking place. So this seems like a BS example to me.

What is the purpose of the word nevertheless in this sentence?

"Nevertheless, we take the security of the GNU system, the tools which make it possible, and the projects we host very seriously."

I too can make up numbers about an economy regarding what might have happened if something that happened didn't happen. Pretty hard to tell me I'm wrong.

Timothy, you did not let me down.

Who in fuck is Grundfos?

"Grundfos is a global leader in advanced pump and water solutions, renowned for its highly efficient, reliable, and sustainable pumping systems."

Ah.

Thank you. That is how I read it also.

If that's your interpretation then you know it wasn't sincere.

to unsophisticated players? Gosh I never would have guessed that. As I recall, the old saying is, if you don't know who the sucker is sitting at the table, it's you.

Only idiots think that was a Nazi salute. Nice to meet you.

Would that be the kind of nuance currently being exhibited by some of you lefties in claiming that the Butler PA assassination attempt was faked, notwithstanding the fact that someone was shot and killed?

What idiot modded down as off-topic this obviously on-topic post?

I'm so glad someone else noticed this. The comment about the comparative stock prices was so extraordinarily stupid I could hardly believe it.

. . . about the subject being facial recognition and her name being Lipps? Who are you people and what have you done with the actual Slashdot?