What is also hard to tell is how complete the story is.

With due respect to DF5JT, people are rarely forthcoming about their failings when they get sanctioned. I am by no means implying that reddit is doing the right thing here (and I've no idea how good or bad they are in general, never having visited the site intentionally in the past decade), but their business is in hosting good posts, and if the OP has only posted good things then it is hard to see how it is in Reddit's interest to sanction them.

It is very easy to claim that you have done nothing wrong. You might even believe that is the case, but we only have one side of the story here. There may be another.

Again I'm not saying that the OP is guilty of anything, but I've been helping out in the operation of online communities before, and it is disturbing how often and easily people will lie about their actions when they get banned. It is a rare and special individual who takes even partial responsibility for their own part.

In tomorrow's headlines:

Pedophile Lobbies Congress For Protection From Child-Harm Lawsuits

Oh wait, how silly of me. People who are not mega-corporations and trillionaire CEOs can't afford to spend tens of millions on lobbying.

Meta has knowingly (according to their own memos) harmed kids on their quest to harvest all human attention and all advertising dollars. Now they can invest a fraction of it to evade all consequences to them. There's a growing corpus of evidence that we are being slowly digested by an unjust universe.

No, please, don't bother telling us what a "Dynamic island" is. Just, you know, copy the blurb from a paywalled article, and you're done!

I'm using Linux, so my uptime is so high I can scarcely remember the last time I needed to reboot.
I seem to recall that it was fast, though.

The only reason they are restoring Nextcloud is because Nextcloud users were forced to migrate to F-Droid. Seriously, that is the only reason I have F-Droid on my phone, Google basically forced me to use a 3rd-party app store. Thanks Google.

I am speaking of personal experience here.

Unfortunately we only hear one side of this story, and even that through BBC's reporting, which has proven to be somewhat less than impartial. (BBC will cheerfully report figures released by the Hamas terror organization without so much as a tiny asterisk.)

The fact is that people will lie about their persecution, misdeeds done to them and pose themselves as victims all the time. This is especially true if the same person feel discrimination and persecution, real or imaginary. The sad fact of the matter is that you cannot take any of it at face value: I have encountered sad complaints about how someone was mistreated by "Organization X" while later finding out that either none of it was true, or that it was true but "Organization X" had actually excellent reasons for sanctioning them.

I'm not saying that Microsoft is impartial, but it is certainly more impartial than someone with the dramatic line "They killed my life online", or the BBC which just echoes it without an ounce of criticism.

Which business unit would you prefer to shut down next? The unit of auditing and subsequently extorting / suing their customers, or the business unit of bankrupting local governments with projects that grow to 5x the original estimate in cost without actually working?

No, it is OUR survival. This is the second time an AI has attempted to murder humans that I know of. :) (Amazon, on the other hand, will be fine.)

While I have little sympathy for crypto firms that allow criminals to use their service unchecked, it must be pointed out: payment processors have become the real gatekeepers of the internet.

They decide what segments of the adult industry are allowed, what sort of gambling, medicine, services, goods they allow their customers to deal with. If you can't get paid, you can't keep your site funded, so ultimately what is and isn't allowed on the internet is decided by the payment processors.

I can't imagine they enjoy this role, but it has become their roles anyway. What we also shouldn't forget is that these are corporations, beholden only to the almighty benefit of the owners and nothing else. The power that they wield is far greater than the scrutiny that they need to pass to make decision.

Granted, this doesn't affect you if you just want to buy or sell cat toys and handmade quilts, but go into anything more controversial or non-trivial, and you best read the ever-changing terms of service pages very carefully before you try and find a payment processor for your business..

I don't think software can do that. You would need sleep() and rand() -- no framework has those.

This presents an opportunity: simply reverse the polarity on the test result.
If you solve it quickly and correctly, you are a bot. If you struggle and fail, come right in!

I hope you will never experience takeover of your country by a criminal gang who use your country's resources to enrich themselves, buy up most of what used to be free media, manipulate the public discourse to their benefit, use your tax money to fund research into ways to entrench their power, modify the electoral and judicial system to make it next to impossible to have a fair election in your lifetime, and that's just the tip of an iceberg.

Sucking Putin's dick is just the tiny part that you see, excuse the pun.

I don't mind studies that quantify the climate effect of various activities. They can be useful for prioritizing what needs to be adjusted first to get the largest benefits. What I do mind is comparisons that seem impactful and profound, but are actually manipulative and therefore only serve to muddy the waters. I also mind when it is made seem like individual habits are the problem and not government policy and industry.

9 million cars seem like a lot! There are about 32 million cars in the UK, so 9 million is 28% fewer cars. Transportation contributes to 26% of emissions in the UK, and about half of that comes from passenger cars.

Multiply all that together and you come to a 3.7% reduction, that's what "9 million cars" translates to.

Congratulations on your research, you gain points for coming up with a useful statistic. You lose those points and maybe 200% more for sensationalism and presenting it like it is far more meaningful than it really is.

Short answer: Yes.

Longer answer: Yes, I want it because OO makes polymorphism easier, and that helps with a range of programming tasks.

Yet longer answer: Perl gives you more than one way of doing things, it always has. Those who like perl tend to favor this approach, detractors point at it as a fault. You can use OO or not in your own code, the choice is yours. A fair number of CPAN modules give you both OO and non-OO interfaces.

Oh, and perl is already excellent at what it does, on that there is consensus (*).

Relax. The wild conspiracies were here for a long time. There was a long "don't feed the trolls" period. This is fun, let's get together sometimes and reminisce (just don't invite the goatse guy).