Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Won't solve the problem (Score 1) 921

Except that a kiosk still doesn't solve the problem. Matter of fact in majority of the mishaps isn't caused by the person taking the order even at a drive-thru in my experience. For instance I walked in to dine at an east Nashville located Hardee's where they had a kiosk on the far right side where they normally have a regular register. I placed the order on it for a 1/2lb bacon cheese thickburger meal, opted for an extra paddy, and round up the final bill for charity and get a cookie, cause why not as I had skipped breakfast and was having quite a late lunch that day.

After about 8 minutes the order was ready, went back to the register counter, got the meal, and sat down back at the table I had chosen after placing the order. I was about 1/4th-way through the burger when I realized this is just a regular single paddy no-bacon cheese burger and the cookie wasn't provided either. Come to find out the teenager who was mostly busy goofing off behind the counter doing practically nothing by standing idly around most of time, and talking with his friends who were trying to do their jobs by making the meals in the back, was responsible for fulfilling the orders by assembling the food on to trays for dining-in customers or into paper bags to give to the customers at the drive-thru. Well this kid had swapped my order with a drive-thru customer's order because he wasn't paying attention. And of course the manager wasn't around to resolve the situation.

I haven't been to a Hardee's since then. Mainly because their restaurants are far away from where I live and I only stopped by there because I hadn't had their burgers in a long time and doesn't motivate me to go the extra mile to eat there again cause I remember the last aforementioned dining-in experience.

Comment Re:Read: You're going to need it for PSVR (Score 1) 67

I see where he's coming from based on his confusion:
[1920, 1080] * 2 = [3840, 2160], or written as:
[1920, 1080] * [2, 2] = [3840, 2160]

3840x2160 is four times the resolution (or size) of 1920x1080 because two dimensions are being multiplied by two, not jut one and so he's not taking into account the other dimension.

Submission + - Contributors Code of Conduct Guru joins GitHub (twitter.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Coraline Ada Ehmke, author of the Contributors Code of Conduct and long term opponent of the "dehumanising meritocracy" of hacker culture has announced that she will be joining GitHub. Although Coraline has been controversial and has even been accused of project disruption and discrediting transgender people she is likely to get a warm welcome from GitHub's managment who need allies in their long struggle to eliminate GitHub's old meritocracy and replace it with a more inclusive and structured culture in the hope of helping move the company forward.

We discussed earlier GitHub's large scale loss it's founders and early developers

Submission + - Adblock Plus comes (somewhat) clean about how Acceptable Ads work (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson writes: The Acceptable Ads program from Adblock Plus has proved slightly controversial. The company behind the ad blocking tool, Eyeo, has already revealed a little about how it makes money from the program — despite the fact that no money changes hands in most whitelisting cases — and today it has opened up further about how is makes its money.

Whilst recognizing that people do want to block ads, Eyeo is also aware that sites do need to benefit from ad revenue — hence Acceptable Ads, non-intrusive ads that it is hoped are less irritating and therefore easier to stomach. But Eyeo itself also wants to make money. How does it decide which company to charge to Acceptable Ads whitelisting, and which to charge? If you're expecting full transparency, you might be disappointed, but we are given a glimpse into how the financial side of things works.

Comment Re:Social media, game center? (Score 1) 113

I always do custom/advanced option when using installers, provided when they actually have that option. I can definitely say that there was no such optional component labelled "Raptr" -or- "AMD Gaming Evolved App" at the time I last used their installer. They probably finally made it optional after so many complaints. It says a lot when you enter "raptr" very first search suggestion is "raptr uninstall".

Comment Re:Social media, game center? (Score 0) 113

Yes, nVidia's installer file is getting bigger and bigger each year, however at least most of it is optional (graphics drivers and control panel for it aren't), unlike AMD's installers where it wasn't possible to opt out of Raptr garbage. GeForce Experience, PhysX, 3D stereo features, and such are completely optional even in their latest driver for my GTX 970.

When I last had to install AMD drivers for Windows for a family member late last year, cause their laptop had a ATI embedded card in it, it feels like AMD has sold by not providing an option at all to not install Raptr which caused a lot of problems until I finally figured out what the hell it was causing the non-closable dialog prompt/splash screen, something about 'gaming membership', every Windows startup without killing it via task manager.

Comment Re:Windows 10? (Score 2) 317

These directions have nothing to do with controlling updating of device drivers through Windows Update. It clearly says "Device installation" as in it only controls as to what to do when a new device is detected and software needs to be installed in order for new devices to function.

As of right now there is no known way for regular Windows users, even on Professional edition, to pick and choose which new software/driver updates to install or ignore. This greatly concerns me as Microsoft is known to distribute graphics drivers lacking the proper OpenGL support compared to acquiring the drivers from the vendor themselves.

Comment Re:Adobe (Score 1) 307

You know from all the problems with Adobe Reader freezing up, crashing, and having font/text aliasing problems depending on size setting of the page nothing frustrates me more than opening those rare PDFs from Intel and a few others where it completely disregards the user preferences and resizes the window to fit the PDF document size and repositions the Reader window to the center of the screen. And of course requires me to resize and reposition the fucking thing so I can actually read the PDF document on my 1080p monitor every damn time I open those PDF files. Naturally there doesn't exist a configuration option to prevent that crap from occurring.

For those PDFs I have to open them through SumatraPDF, but I don't know about those troublesome PDFs until I accidentally open them through Adobe Reader. The only downside to SumatraPDF is that it lacks a proper advanced Find/Search window like Reader's so that it can list all results at once instead of me having to keep pressing next to find the section of the document I'm looking for.

Comment Re:That's a garbage lawsuit (Score 4, Insightful) 286

Killzone's multiplayer mode actually outputs natively in 960x1080 resolution, half of the 1920x1080 standard for "1080p." To output full 1080p graphics, this source image is fixed with a "temporal upscale" that fills in gaps with a horizontal interlace made up of pixels from the previous frame. The result is graphical performance that the lawsuit (and many reviews) call "blurry to the point of distraction."

Last time I checked that's called interlaced video, not progressive. Just because source video is 1080i, but goes out the HDMI video transmitter chip as 1080p it does not make it OK to call it 1080p since the source video is not progressive.

Slashdot Top Deals

Any program which runs right is obsolete.

Working...