Submission + - US Air Force Selects Boeing 747-8 To Replace Air Force One (reuters.com)
Submission + - U.S. Justice Department Using Fake Towers on Planes to Gather Data from Phones
While the Justice Department would not confirm or deny the existence of such a program, Verizon denies any involvement in this program, and DRT (a subsidiary of Boeing), AT&T, and Sprint have all declined to comment.
Comment Re:However.. (Score -1) 247
- Docked Columbia at the ISS,
- Moved the crew onto the ISS (potentially saving their lives),
- Conducted more analysis of the damage there, while
- Giving NASA more time to ready Atlantis or Discovery to bring them back, or even have the Russians ready a Soyuz rocket.
That gets the crew somewhere that they would not be in danger of something catastrophic (like what happened to Columbia), at the cost of a bit more space and time in orbit. All could have made it back to Earth alive.
But that's just me, and I may be totally wrong.
Comment Chicago Gaming Console at Costco (Score 1) 322
Submission + - Unlocking New Mobile Phones Set to Become Illegal in the US 1
While this doesn't apply to phones purchased before the window closes, this means that after 1/26/13, for any new mobile phone you purchase, you'll have to fulfill your contract, or break the law to unlock it.
Comment Shouldn't the charges be dropped? (Score 1) 620
Submission + - HP Software Update Cancels Food Stamps (ocregister.com) 1
Submission + - UC online courses' alarming growth rate (sfgate.com)
The first year results: one person paid $1,400 for an online calculus class worth 4 credits. Now 4 people are signed up. Me thinks head will roll on this one...
Submission + - Rare Midnight Solar Caught in the Arctic (wired.com)
NASA has the details, while NPR also has a small blurb on it, with Tromsø, Norway resident Rhys Jones adding some pictures to Flikr, and SpaceWeather putting together a gallery.
Comment This is misleading. (Score 1) 342
This is absolutely misleading, everyone.
First off, there is no 'ban' on personal electronic devices on the flight deck. According to both TFA and the original FAA press release, the FAA is asking carriers to create and enforce their rules regarding this. Absolutely NOTHING in the article outright bans them from using them on the flight deck.
Second, this only affects FAR Part 121 operations (read: commercial travel). Part 61 (General Aviation), Part 91 (Private Aircraft and Fractional Owners), and Part 135 (On Demand/commuters) do not appear to be affected by this 'request'.
Don't you just love it when the media jump the shark^H^H^H^H^Hgun on every single non-issue...
BL.
Australian AvP Ban Reversed 71
Submission + - US Air Force Seeks Air Force One Replacement
Net Neutrality Vets Join Obama FCC Transition Team 179